مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری و ریسک اصولی – اسپرینگر ۲۰۱۸

springer

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۱۹ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه اسپرینگر
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Accounting information quality and systematic risk
ترجمه عنوان مقاله کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری و ریسک اصولی
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط حسابداری
گرایش های مرتبط حسابداری مالی و حسابداری دولتی
مجله بررسی کمی داراریی و حسابداری – Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
دانشگاه Department of Accounting and Finance – University of Alabama in Huntsville – USA
کلمات کلیدی کیفیت اطلاعات حسابداری، خطر سیستماتیک، تعهد غیر طبیعی، اندوژنیت
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Accounting information quality, Systematic risk, Abnormal accruals, Endogeneity
کد محصول E6380
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱ Introduction

Whether accounting information quality affects the cost of capital has been the central theme of a large and growing literature in accounting, economics, and finance. This literature provides considerable empirical evidence of a negative relation between the two constructs (Armstrong et al. 2013). However, the mechanism behind the relation has been a subject of intense debate (Beyer et al. 2010; Tang 2011). We contribute to the debate by investigating empirically whether and how accounting information quality is related to existing systematic risk factors (i.e., firm betas). In neoclassical theory, a firm’s cost of capital depends exclusively on exposure to systematic risk, i.e., systematic risk factors and risk premiums on these factors (Hughes et al. 2007; Armstrong et al. 2013). Thus, accounting information quality can affect the cost of capital in only three possible ways: First, accounting information quality constitutes an additional systematic risk factor that is distinct from other known such factors; second, accounting information quality itself is not a systematic risk factor but affects risk premiums on known such factors; and third, accounting information quality is somehow related to known systematic risk factors. Previous studies have closely examined the first two possibilities, producing completely contradictory insights. For example, Easley and O’hara (2004), Francis et al. (2005), and Bandyopadhyay et al. (2017) suggest that accounting information quality is a priced systematic risk factor. However, Core et al. (2008) show that accounting information quality represents idiosyncratic risk that can be completely diversified away. Hughes et al. (2007) argue that high accounting information quality decreases risk premiums on known systematic factors, but Veronesi (2000) demonstrates the opposite. Despite these deadlock situations involving the first two possibilities, the third one has received relatively little attention in academic research.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *