مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد استفاده از حسابرسان چهار بزرگ و جمع آموری پول – امرالد ۲۰۱۷

emerald

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۳۴ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه امرالد
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Use of Big Four auditors and fund raising: Evidence from developing and emerging markets
ترجمه عنوان مقاله استفاده از حسابرسان چهار بزرگ و جمع آموری پول: بازارهای در حال توسعه و در حال ظهور
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط حسابداری
گرایش های مرتبط حسابداری مالی، حسابرسی
مجله مجله بین المللی بازارهای نوظهور – International Journal of Emerging Markets
دانشگاه School of Business and Law – University of Agder – Norway
کلمات کلیدی کیفیت حسابرسی؛ هزینه بدهی؛ جذب سرمایه؛ دارایی کوچک؛ بازارهای نوظهور
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Audit quality; Cost of debt; Fund raising; Microfinance; Emerging markets
کد محصول E6588
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱٫ Introduction

Improved audit quality is associated with fewer information asymmetries between an organization and its stakeholders (Chen et al., 2011). Prior research suggests that audit quality has real consequences for an organization; the reduced risk caused by lower agency costs improves fund raising possibilities and reduces costs of capital (Kitching, 2009; Gul et al., 2013; Pratoomsuwan, 2012). An indicator variable for use of Big Four auditors is the most commonly used proxy variable for audit quality (Hay et al., 2006), and several studies suggest that use of Big Four auditors is associated with improved fund raising opportunities and lower costs of capital (Boone et al., 2010; Pittman and Fortin, 2004; Mansi et al., 2004). However, recent reviews of audit quality research find that empirical results from this line of research are mixed and highly country-specific (Gul et al., 2013; Eilifsen and Willekens, 2008; Tsipouridou and Spathis, 2012). For instance, Francis and Wang (2008) suggest that Big Four auditors do not universally enforce higher accounting quality. Their study concludes that the importance of auditor choice is dependent on the investor protection level of the country in which the firms are situated. Building on Francis and Wang (1998), Gul et al. (2013) find that cost of debt is lower for firms using Big Four auditors, but the effect is most pronounced in countries with strong investor protection. In a similar vein, El Ghoul et al. (2016a) find that equity financing costs are lower in the presence of Big Four auditors, especially in countries with better institutions governing investor protection and disclosure regulation. Interestingly, their findings suggest that audit quality does not matter in countries with weak investor protection and disclosure regulation. To answer the challenge of Francis and Wang (2008) to learn more about audit quality and its possible consequences in different settings, we turn to the microfinance industry in developing and emerging markets and use a unique hand-collected dataset as our case. Specifically, we analyze the association between Big Four auditors and access to various sources of debt capital.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *