مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد بررسی مفهوم توسعه پایدار در آموزش – اسپرینگر ۲۰۱۷

springer

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۱۰ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه اسپرینگر
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice
ترجمه عنوان مقاله بررسی مفهوم توسعه پایدار در آموزش برای توسعه پایدار: مفاهیم برای تحقیقات ESD
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط علوم تربیتی
گرایش های مرتبط تکنولوژی آموزشی
مجله محیط زیست، توسعه و پایداری – Environment – Development and Sustainability
دانشگاه Research Unit Edubron – University of Antwerp – Belgium
کلمات کلیدی  آموزش برای توسعه پایدار، مفهوم توسعه پایدار، رویکرد جامع، شکاف سیاسی-عملی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Education for sustainable development, The concept of sustainable development, Holistic approach, Policy–practice gap
کد محصول E7435
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱ Introduction

This paper investigates the concept of sustainable development (SD) (a) in international policy documents which shaped education for sustainable development (ESD), (b) in the academic discourse in the field of ESD and (c) in the views of students and teachers. The above stakeholders influence one another and eventually, ESD practice. The purpose of this paper is to propose implications in ESD practice and research. This paper adopts a holistic approach to SD, meaning that SD is considered as an integrated concept of three pillars: environment, economy and society (Giddings et al. 2002). Accordingly, ESD addresses sustainable development issues, which are not only environmental problems but also social and economic ones (e.g. Corney and Reid 2007).

۲ The SD concept in international policy documents The 1987 Brundtland report, titled ‘Our Common Future’, officially introduced the idea of sustainable development and acknowledged the interconnection of ecological, economic and social systems (Evans 2010). While the Belgrade and the Tbilisi reports refer to ‘environment’ only, Agenda 21 speaks of ‘environment and development’ (Gough 1997), thus moving closer towards social and economic issues (Stevenson 2006). Although social and economic issues were also mentioned in the prior documents, they were not emphasized (Stevenson 2006). Agenda 21 (UN 1992, p. 320) makes it explicit that in order to be effective, environmental education and development education should deal with all aspects of our environment, that is, the ecological and physical/biological environment as well as the socio-economic one. As Evans states (2010, p. 44) ‘Agenda 21 was a blueprint for sustainable development’. The Declaration of Thessaloniki in 1997 was an attempt towards the implementation of Agenda 21. The Johannesburg Summit in 2002 reaffirmed that the three dimensions of SD must form the content of sustainable learning (Roorda 2010). The Johannesburg Declaration underlines that ‘the interdependent and mutually reinforcing’ pillars of SD should be strengthened (UN 2002, para 5). The next passage in the Johannesburg Declaration (para 8) trails the journey of Environmental and Sustainability Education Research (ESER), as it has come to be called nowadays, from Stockholm to Rio and from Rio to Johannesburg. In Stockholm, back in 1997, the matter of concern was environmental degradation, whereas in Rio, the focus of the discussion lays not only on the protection of the environment, but also on social and economic development, which are seen as the fundaments of SD. This represents a more integrated view of SD, since it does not limit its scope, but it refers to SD as a whole.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *