This paper investigates stock liquidity as a determinant of the cost of equity for firms from 52 countries. Liquidity is a complex notion that influences the firm’s cost of equity capital through at least two channels, level and risk (Amihud, 1986; Acharya and Pederson, 2005). Investors care about the level of liquidity because it enables them to trade large quantities at a low cost in a relatively short amount of time. Amihud and Mendelson (1986) were the first to link liquidity level and the firm’s cost of equity by showing that expected returns increase in illiquidity costs. More recent studies however focus on the risk dimension of liquidity and demonstrate that stock liquidity constitutes a source of risk if it dissipates at inopportune times (e.g., Pástor and Stambaugh, 2003; and Sadka, 2006). 1 These studies show that independent of the level of liquidity, liquidity risk is significantly associated with stock expected returns. Although the evidence regarding the relationship between liquidity and stock returns is compelling, no study has investigated the important question of whether liquidity level and risks affect the ex-ante measures of the cost of equity capital. In this paper, we contribute to the literature by examining the relation between the ex-ante cost of equity capital, implied by share prices and analyst forecasts, and the time-varying stock’s liquidity level and risks in a crosscountry setting. We further evaluate the extent to which this relationship is affected by market downturns. We rely on Amihud’s (2002) liquidity measure, , as a proxy for the illiquidity level and supplement it with three time-varying liquidity risks that stem from co-variations between firmlevel illiquidity and returns and market-level illiquidity and returns (e.g., Pástor and Stambaugh ۲۰۰۳; Acharya and Pedersen, 2005; Sadka, 2006). In a unified theoretical model, Acharya and Pederson (2005) develop a theoretical Liquidity Adjusted Capital Asset Pricing Model (LCAPM) and identify three time-varying liquidity co-variance risks that determine expected returns. The authors show that expected returns (i) increase in the co-variances between firm-level illiquidity and market illiquidity, (ii) decrease in the co-variance risk between firm-level returns and market illiquidity, and (iii) also decrease in the co-variance risk between firm-level illiquidity and market returns. In other words, investors require higher expected returns for stocks that become illiquid when the market is illiquid, accept lower expected returns for stocks with high returns when the market is illiquid, and also accept lower expected returns for liquid stocks during market downturns.