مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد توسعه جدید: تفکر ناب در شهرهای هوشمند – تیلور و فرانسیس ۲۰۱۸

taylorandfrancis

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله توسعه جدید: تفکر ناب در شهرهای هوشمند
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله New development: Lean Thinking in smart cities
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۶ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه تیلور و فرانسیس
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس نمیباشد
نمایه (index) scopus – master journals – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۰٫۸۸۱ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index ۴۰ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شاخص SJR ۰٫۵۶ در سال ۲۰۱۸
رشته های مرتبط مهندسی معماری، شهرسازی
گرایش های مرتبط طراحی شهری، مدیریت شهری
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله / کنفرانس پول و مدیریت عمومی – Public Money & Management
دانشگاه  Arie Herscovici is a practitioner and a Senior Lecturer at the West Galilee College – Israel
کلمات کلیدی تفکر کم سود؛ شهر هوشمند؛ تل آویو؛ مدیریت شهری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Lean Thinking; smart city; Tel Aviv; urban management.
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1450924
کد محصول E9753
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
What actually is a smart city?
What is Lean Thinking?
Using Lean Thinking to evaluate and guide a smart city
The case of Tel Aviv
Discussion and conclusions
References

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
The smart city concept lacks a set of coherent criteria for evaluating its effectiveness as an urban management system, its compatibility with human rights principles, and its contribution to a democratic, participatory, social urban regime. The author explains why Lean Thinking principles can be applied to evaluate the ‘smartness’ of cities and serve as guidelines for improvement.

What actually is a smart city?

The smart city concept has been promoted as the solution to most urban problems—a technology-led urban Utopia (Kirby, 2013; Townsend, 2013; Hollands, 2015). Yet, if such an information-rich city does not encourage ‘people [to] think for themselves or communicate well with one another’, then it is not really smart, since the use of technology by itself is not enough to qualify it as ‘smart’ (Sennett, 2012). Some researchers have suggested that more human ‘smartness’ is manifested in the use of technology to collaboratively solve shared problems (de Lange and de Waal, 2012; Chatterton, 2013; Radywyla and Biggs, 2013). De Lange and de Waal (2013) use the term ‘social cities’ to refer to cases in which urban technologies are used in that manner. In addition, according to Harvey (2012): ‘This will require new participatory urban technologies, greater social and economic inclusion, and a substantial shift in power from corporate business and entrepreneurial city leaders to ordinary people and communities that make up cities’. A very significant interest driving smart city development is the huge profits that can be made by ICT firms, as well as by engineering, property development, and construction companies (Hollands, 2015). Firms are cooperating to get a foothold in this market, for example the Urban Intelligence Industrial Complex, involving IBM, Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, and Philips (Hill, 2013). Anttiroiko (2013) explains that: ‘What is envisioned are futuristic cities which will offer a high quality of life for residents in terms of security, welfare, culture and entertainment, and other aspects of everyday life’. The underlying assumption is that we all have the same preferences and same the definition of ‘high quality of life’ (Hollands, 2015). Business influences are enhanced by the drift in city governance towards urban entrepreneurialism. Cities have begun to compete with one another to attract global capital, and are marketing themselves as ‘creative’ or ‘smart cities’. Most smart city initiatives come from either corporations or urban governments (McGuirk, 2012). While citizens are essential to the crowdsourcing model, which most smart city initiatives depend upon, they are also often perceived as an obstacle that needs convincing of the benefits of ICT (Hollands, 2015).

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *