مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد درک مشروعیت کنترل در توسعه سیستم های اطلاعاتی – امرالد ۲۰۱۷

emerald

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله درک مشروعیت کنترل در توسعه سیستم های اطلاعاتی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Perceptions of control legitimacy in information systems development
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۳۰ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه امرالد
نوع نگارش مقاله مقاله پژوهشی (Research article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت، مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات
گرایش های مرتبط مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، مدیریت سیستم های اطلاعات
مجله فناوری اطلاعات و مردم – Information Technology & People
دانشگاه Bentley University – Waltham – Massachusetts – USA
کلمات کلیدی توسعه سیستم های اطلاعاتی (ISD)، کنترل مدیریت، مطالعات موردی چندگانه، عملکرد IS، مشروعیت کنترل، تاثیرات اجتماعی-احساسی، عملکرد ISD
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Information systems development (ISD), Management control, Multiple case studies, IS performance, Control legitimacy, Socio-emotional side effects, ISD performance
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2016-0275
کد محصول E9160
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Introduction

Controlling information systems development (ISD) is a fundamental but also highly challenging task (Kirsch, 1996). Managers (controllers) exercise control – including the use of formal policies and standards, periodic status reports, as well as socialization and empowerment strategies – in an attempt to influence and align the behavior of subordinates (controllees) with organizational objectives (Flamholtz et al., 1985; Ouchi, 1979; Eisenhardt, 1985). Existing ISD research provides valuable insights into how task and stakeholder characteristics relate to the selection of specific controls (Kirsch, 1996, 1997; Choudhury and Sabherwal, 2003; Tiwana, 2010), as well as the effects of such controls on ISD performance (Henderson and Lee, 1992; Tiwana and Keil, 2009; Maruping et al., 2009). Despite these theoretical advances, two research gaps in prior literature are particularly noteworthy. First, existing research primarily focuses on the controller, including the organizational and process-oriented factors that should be considered when designing and implementing controls. This focus largely neglects salient controllee-centric factors including the perceptions of, and reactions to, ISD controls (Cram, 2011; Alvarez, 2002; Wiener et al., 2016). This is problematic since, without explicitly considering controllee attitudes and preferences, managers may inadvertently select and implement controls that contribute to subordinate dissatisfaction and stress, potentially leading to negative side-effects on ISD performance (e.g. efficiency, quality, speed). A second, related gap concerns the inconsistent research results regarding control effects on ISD performance. While some studies find empirical support for the direct and positive effects of ISD controls on performance (Henderson and Lee, 1992; Liu et al., 2010; Tjornehoj and Mathiassen, 2008) and related dimensions (Keil et al., 2013; Maruping et al., 2009; Kautz, 2011), other studies fail to observe direct performance effects of ISD controls (Tiwana and Keil, 2007) and even observe negative effects (Tiwana, 2010; Tiwana and Keil, 2009). One potential explanation for these inconsistencies is that the link between ISD controls and performance is moderated or mediated by controllee-related variables not included in previous studies (Narayanaswamy et al., 2013; Tiwana and Keil, 2009). One such variable may be the extent to which subordinates perceive the controls implemented by their manager to be legitimate. This explanation is consistent with prior research outside of the IS field, which provides evidence for the link between perceptions of legitimacy and performance-related variables such as trust (Suchman, 1995), commitment and motivation ( Jaffee, 1991; Workman, 2009), and job effectiveness (Bijlsma-Frankema and Costa, 2010; Niehoff and Moorman, 1993). If a relationship could be established between control activities, control legitimacy, and ISD performance, it may help to clarify why inconsistencies have existed in past research.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *