مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد طراحی لرزه ای ساختمان های ساخته شده با بتن مسلح برای زلزله – الزویر ۲۰۱۷

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد طراحی لرزه ای ساختمان های ساخته شده با بتن مسلح برای زلزله – الزویر ۲۰۱۷

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۶ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه الزویر
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Seismic Design Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Near-Source Earthquakes by Using Nonlinear Time History Analyses
ترجمه عنوان مقاله ارزیابی طراحی لرزه ای ساختمان های ساخته شده با بتن مسلح برای زلزله های کم عمق با استفاده از تجزیه و تحلیل تاریخچه زمان غیر خطی
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مهندسی عمران
گرایش های مرتبط سازه، زلزله
مجله مجله مهندسی پروسیدیا – Procedia Engineering
دانشگاه Structural Engineering Research Center – Tehran – Iran
کلمات کلیدی ساختمان های چند طبقه با فریم های لحظه ای مخصوص، شتاب دهنده های سه جزء، جابجایی و شتاب سقف، برش پایه، رانش، لولای پلاستیکی، سطح عملکرد ایمنی زندگی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Multi-story buildings with special moment frames, three-component accelerograms, roof displacement and acceleration, base shear, inter-story drift, plastic hinges, life safety performance level
کد محصول E7577
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱٫ Introduction

Most of the current seismic design codes for building systems claim, either explicitly or implicitly, that design of buildings’ structures based on their requirements leads to Life Safety (LS) as their minimum Performance Level (PL). This is while some buildings, designed based on the current codes’ provisions, and constructed based on high standards, under good supervision, have shown unacceptable PLs, even collapse in some recent earthquakes, particularly near-source events. Also in many cases the extent of damage in the earthquake stricken buildings has been so high, that the demolishing and reconstruction of the building have become inevitable. On this basis, it seems that the code provisions still need improvement to create sufficient confidence in the engineering community. So far, several studies have been conducted on the adequacy evaluation of seismic design codes’ provisions and requirements. Hosseini and Yaghoobi Vayeghan (2000) worked on design verification of an existing 8-story irregular steel building by both push-over and three-dimensional dynamic analyses [1]. With regard to concrete buildings Memari and colleagues (2000) conducted a seismic assessment of an existing 32-story reinforced concrete framed tube building using inelastic dynamic time-history analysis to obtain force and deformation response of the structure subjected to three ground motion records [2]. Fajfar (2000) presented a relatively simple nonlinear method for the seismic analysis of structures (the N2 method) [3]. It combines the pushover analysis of a multi‐degree‐of‐freedom model with the response spectrum analysis of an equivalent single‐degree‐of‐freedom system. Alchalabi (2000) described the application of the Japanese standard method of seismic capacity evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings to a hypothetical simple Syrian building, and three level evaluations were made to estimate the building’s seismic capacity [4]. Goulet and colleagues (2007) illustrated a state-of-the-art seismic performance assessment through application to a reinforced-concrete moment-frame building designed per 2003 building code provisions [5]. Virote (2008) evaluated the seismic performances of reinforced-concrete buildings by nonlinear static analysis (pushover analysis and modal pushover analysis) and nonlinear time history analysis [6]. Epackachi (2012) studied the linear and nonlinear behavior of one of the tallest RC buildings, a 56-storey structure, located in a high seismic zone in Iran [7]. Masi (2012) evaluated the seismic capacity of some structural models which represent real RC existing buildings designed to gravity loads only, through non-linear dynamic simulations [8]. Thwin (2014) carried out computer aided analysis of twelve storied reinforced-concrete rectangular shape residential building for static and dynamic approach by using ETABS software [9]. Moniri (2014) investigated the results of illustrious characteristics of near-fault ground motions on the seismic response of three reinforced concrete structures (6-Story, 10-Story and 15-Story) [10]. Finally, Yoo (2016) carried out nonlinear dynamic analysis using the PERFORM-3D for small-size pilloti-type RC buildings and assessed their seismic performance [11].

ثبت دیدگاه