مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تحقیق مربوط به ساختار خدمات رسانی در ارائه محصول – امرالد ۲۰۱۷

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تحقیق مربوط به ساختار خدمات رسانی در ارائه محصول – امرالد ۲۰۱۷

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۲۳ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه امرالد
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Structuring servitization-related research
ترجمه عنوان مقاله تحقیق مربوط به ساختار خدمات رسانی در ارائه محصول
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط بازاریابی
مجله مجله بین المللی مدیریت عملیات و تولید – International Journal of Operations & Production Management
دانشگاه Department of Management – University of Vaasa – Finland
کلمات کلیدی Servitization، انفوزیون خدمات، تجزیه و تحلیل کتابشناختی، راه حل های یکپارچه، سیستم های محصولات محصول، انتقال خدمات
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی  Servitization, Service infusion, Bibliometric analysis, Integrated solutions, Product-service systems, Service transition
کد محصول E6006
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱٫ Introduction

Born in the late 1980s, research on product-service integration took off in the mid-2000s after the publication of many foundational articles (Brax, 2005; Davies, 2004; Gebauer et al., 2005; Mathieu, 2001a, b; Mont, 2002; Oliva and Kallenberg, 2003; Tukker, 2004). Introduced by Vandermerwe and Rada (1988), the term “servitization” gained popularity after two reviews by Baines et al. (2007) and Baines, Lightfoot, Benedettini and Kay (2009). In the following years, servitization became nearly synonymous with companies moving from selling products and basic services to selling product-service systems (PSS). These PSS typically include advanced lifecycle services and involve changes in companies’ business models (Durugbo, 2013; Rabetino et al., 2015). Evidence demonstrates that some iconic manufacturers across industries, such as Caterpillar, IBM, and Rolls-Royce, have escaped the product commoditization trap and increasingly garnered benefits from their shift to services (Huikkola et al., 2016). This strategic shift has inspired a growing number of publications providing knowledge and avenues for future research. Knowledge has accumulated within related scholarly communities (Lightfoot et al., 2013), i.e. groups of scholars who “are linked by shared interest in distinct yet related problems in the same research area” (Vogel, 2012, pp. 1018-1019). Researchers from the above communities have adopted different perspectives. In addition to the industrial marketing-led and service operations management-led servitization research (the mainstream), Kamp and Parry (2017, p. 12) recognize other “aligned research communities” that “refer to servitization-related concepts without using the term itself.” In this fast-growing domain (Kowalkowski, Gebauer and Oliva, 2017), the coexistence of multidisciplinary viewpoints, methods, and terminologies has increased complexity, which limits knowledge accumulation (Geum and Park, 2011; Pawar et al., 2009; Tukker, 2015). Although meticulous review efforts already exist (Baines et al., 2007; Baines, Lightfoot, Benedettini and Kay, 2009; Boehm and Thomas, 2013; Brax and Visintin, 2017; Luoto et al., 2017; Velamuri et al., 2011), the inclusion of a limited number of articles and the use of different strategies to organize conceptual contributions hinder the integration of the results. Thus, there is a need to create an accurate understanding to permit better integration and a deeper analysis of the interactions among adjacent but detached research communities (Cavalieri and Pezzotta, 2012; Boehm and Thomas, 2013; Lightfoot et al., 2013).

ثبت دیدگاه