مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد نقش حریم خصوصی داده ها در بازاریابی – اسپرینگر ۲۰۱۶

springer

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله نقش حریم خصوصی داده ها در بازاریابی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله The role of data privacy in marketing
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۶
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۲۱ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه اسپرینگر
نوع نگارش مقاله  مقاله مفهومی (CONCEPTUAL PAPER)
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط بازاریابی
مجله مجله آکادمی علوم بازاریابی – Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
دانشگاه College of Business – Colorado State University – USA
کلمات کلیدی حریم خصوصی، کلان داده، اخلاق، مقاله مروری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Privacy, Big data, Ethics, Review article
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0495-4
کد محصول E9119
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Privacy in society

Privacy often is cast as an individual Bright,^ and discussions about the Bright to privacy^ are common. Although Warren and Brandeis (1890) famously advocated for a right to be left alone, a standalone Constitutional right to privacy does not exist. The United States Bill of Rights embeds privacy protections into a number of Amendments (e.g., the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth). Interestingly, protections that resemble a right to privacy have been observed across the courts and treated with great importance in the American justice system (Langenderfer and Miyazaki 2009). However, in the absence of a dedicated privacy right, federal regulators have been reluctant to enforce privacy protections across companies and governmental entities (Solove 2011). To date, questions surrounding whether and how the federal government ought to intervene (and if so, how to intervene effectively) remain challenging for key regulatory bodies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC, which has emerged as the key governing body in the context of consumer information privacy issues, currently applies information privacy protections using two frameworks that include the Notice-and-Choice Model comprised of Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs), and the Harms-Based Model that pivots on whether physical or economic harm results to consumers from organizational misuse of (or more often, neglect or failure to protect) personal information (Ohlhausen 2014). From 1970 until 1993, thirteen different privacy-related regulations were passed by Congress (Caudill and Murphy 2000). Since the mid-1990s, only the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 and the Gramm-LeachBliley Act of 1999 that requires financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices to their customers and to safeguard sensitive data have been passed. The FTC issues regular reports regarding privacy, but this is a nonbinding effort by the Commission to spur more responsible behavior by marketers. In the same vein, the White House (2012) published an extensive report that included a seven-point BConsumer Privacy Bill of Rights^ linked to the FIPPs. In 2014, it followed those efforts by releasing a report focused on big data that emphasized student information privacy, company notification in the event of a data breach, and investigated big data in the context of price discrimination (White House 2014). Like the FTC efforts, the White House initiatives have focused attention, discussion, and funding, but have led to no new consumer privacy regulations.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *