مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تصمیم گیری بحرانی: اشتراک استراتژی بصری و تحلیلی – امرالد ۲۰۱۸

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تصمیم گیری بحرانی: اشتراک استراتژی بصری و تحلیلی – امرالد ۲۰۱۸

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی  ۱۴ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه امرالد
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Crisis decision-making: the overlap between intuitive and analytical strategies
ترجمه عنوان مقاله تصمیم گیری بحرانی: اشتراک استراتژی بصری و تحلیلی
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط مدیریت بحران
مجله تصمیم گیری در مدیریت – Management Decision
دانشگاه Faculty of Business and Law – Coventry University – UK
کلمات کلیدی تصمیم گیری، پردازش اطلاعات، بصیرت، مدیریت بحران، کارشناسان، قضاوت بصری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Decision making, Information processing, Intuition, Crisis management, Experts, Intuitive judgement
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2017-0333
کد محصول E8328
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Introduction

The traditional (classical) decision-making theory dominated common understanding of how experts make decisions for decades. It assumes that people have unfailing memory and possess large computational abilities required to run complex decision calculations (Satz and Ferejohn, 1994; Scott, 2000; Bonabeau, 2003). Similar to the concept of unbounded rationality the theory suggests that people are generally exposed to a great deal of information which allows them to make the “best” decision. It is also assumes that decision makers are aware of most, if not all, available choice options alongside their potential impacts. The common prescription by the rational choice theorists is that professionals should avoid making intuitive decisions wherever possible and instead think more deliberately. However, with the emergence of a body of knowledge known as naturalistic decision making (NDM) in the early 1980s, researchers began to re-conceptualize the subject of expert decision making across a range of domains (Zsambok, 1997; Kahneman and Klein, 2009; Salas et al., 2012; Kermarrec and Bossard, 2014; Klein, 2015; Gore and Conway, 2016). Consequently, these studies began to identify inherent flaws in some of the assumptions underpinning the rational choice theory. First, the views of “rationality” and “optimality” were criticized for being unrealistic in real-life crisis environments as prior evidence consistently demonstrated the difficulty in maintaining an open mind, particularly when officers have very limited thinking time for which to make high-stake decisions (Tversky and Kahneman, 1973; Kahneman, 2003; Dunning et al., 2003; Tsoukas, 2003; Klein, 2003, p. 21; Waroquier et al., 2010). The prediction here is that operators are always likely to tweak the decision criteria, albeit unconsciously, to fit their pre-conceived and pre-determined notions. Second, the fact that in recent years crisis environments have become increasingly fast paced and relatively more dynamic than previously assumed has meant that it appeared unlikely that people would have the time to make complex calculations that evaluated different options (Tissington and Flin, 2005; Sinclair and Ashkanasy, 2005; Salas et al., 2012; Sadler-smith, 2016). Although prior evidence suggests that decision making involves more than one reasoning strategy, at least in practice, i.e. the intuitive and analytical approaches, the debate regarding the dominant thinking mode and the preferred sequence these should follow has continued to garner strength in the current literature (Dane and Pratt, 2009; Hodgkinson et al., 2009; Kahneman and Klein, 2009; Hoffrage and Marewski, 2015; Okoli et al., 2016a). Should people first draw on their intuition before engaging in analysis or is it the other way round? In what ways do the task environment influence the choice of a dominant thinking strategy at any given time?

ثبت دیدگاه