مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان – الزویر ۲۰۱۹

elsevier

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله مکانیزم های مختلف بی تفاوتی اخلاقی به عنوان واسطه های متعدد در ارتباط بین والدین خشن و پرخاشگری نوجوانان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Different mechanisms of moral disengagement as multiple mediators in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۹
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۴ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله کوتاه (Short communication)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس نمیباشد
نمایه (index) Scopus – Master Journal List – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۲٫۱۱۳ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index ۱۲۹ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شاخص SJR ۱٫۱۸۱ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شناسه ISSN ۰۱۹۱-۸۸۶۹
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q1 در سال ۲۰۱۷
رشته های مرتبط روانشناسی
گرایش های مرتبط روانشناسی تربیتی، روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی رشد
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله  شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences
دانشگاه Faculty of Education, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
کلمات کلیدی والدین خشن ، بی تفاوتی اخلاقی، پرخاشگری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Harsh parenting، Moral disengagement، Aggression
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.037
کد محصول E11140
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract

۱- Introduction

۲- Method

۳- Results

۴- Discussion

References

بخشی از متن مقاله:

Abstract

The present study examined the different mediating roles of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. 389 junior high school students participated. Data were collected by parents reporting on spouses’ harsh parenting, adolescents themselves reporting on moral disengagement and nominating out aggressive classmates. The results indicated that harsh parenting was positively associated with each mechanism of moral disengagement and only the mechanisms of moral justification and euphemistic language completely mediated the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. These results add to extant literature on how harsh parenting could risk adolescents for aggressive behaviors.

Introduction

Although research has indicated that harsh parenting could risk children for aggressive behaviors (Chen & Raine, 2018; Wang, 2017), the mediating mechanisms involved in this relationship remain to be further explored. Taking into account the impact of moral disengagement on child aggression (Gini, 2006; Shulman, Cauffman, Piquero, & Fagan, 2011), one might expect that moral disengagement might mediate the relation of harsh parenting to child aggression if harsh parenting functions as a risk factor for child moral disengagement. This study intends to explore the different mediating roles of the eight types of moral disengagement mechanisms in the association between harsh parenting and adolescent aggression. Following Bandura’s (1999) social cognitive theory of moral agency, individuals would desist from injurious conduct under the guidance of internalized moral standards. Committing detrimental conduct would risk both external sanctions such as being disapproved and internal selfcondemnation such as shame and guilt. To refrain from internal selfsanctions, individuals seek to rationalize their detrimental behaviors that violate moral standards through various psychosocial processes that have been conceptualized as moral disengagement (Bandura, Barbaranelli, Caprara, & Pastorelli, 1996). Bandura et al. (1996) have proposed eight mechanisms of moral disengagement which could be classified as the following four groups. First, cognitive reconstruing enables individuals to reinterpret the reprehensible behaviors in a positive tone, including the following three mechanisms: moral justification by portraying the immoral conduct as warranted, advantageous comparison by contrasting a detrimental conduct with a worse one to make it seem less serious, euphemistic labeling by using convoluted or periphrastic language to mask condemnable conduct. The second group promotes people to distort the agentive relation between their harmful conduct and the behavioral consequences, mainly comprising displacement and diffusion of responsibility (i.e., regarding one’s own immoral conduct as being caused by external sources such as social pressures rather than as being personally responsible). The third group consists of the following mechanisms: distorting by minimizing or even disregarding the consequences of one’s reprehensible conduct. The fourth group capacitates self-censure to be avoided by dehumanization (i.e., stripping people of human qualities) or by attribution of blame (i.e., viewing themselves as being compelled into destructive conduct by victims who deserve being punished).

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *