مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد عملکرد حسابرسی داخلی – الزویر ۲۰۱۹

elsevier

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله عواملی که بر استفاده درک شده از عملکرد حسابرسی داخلی توسط کمیته مدیریت اجرایی و حسابرسی تأثیر می گذارد
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Factors that influence the perceived use of the internal audit function’s work by executive management and audit committee
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۹
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۷ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) Scopus
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۰٫۹۵۸ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شاخص H_index ۲۴ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شاخص SJR ۰٫۳۰۸ در سال ۲۰۱۸
شناسه ISSN ۰۸۸۲-۶۱۱۰
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q3 در سال ۲۰۱۸
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر دارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط حسابداری، مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط حسابرسی، مدیریت اجرایی
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله / کنفرانس پیشرفت هایی در حسابداری – Advances in Accounting
دانشگاه University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
کلمات کلیدی حسابرسی داخلی، عملکرد حسابرسی داخلی، حاکمیت شرکتی، کمیته حسابرسی، نظریه نمایندگی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Internal audit، Internal auditing function، Corporate governance، Audit committee، Agency theory
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2019.01.001
کد محصول  E13724
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
JEL classification
۱٫ Introduction
۲٫ Prior research and research questions
۳٫ Research methodology
۴٫ Results and discussion
۵٫ Conclusion
Data availability
Appendix A. Instrument and variable definition
References

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Abstract

The internal audit function (IAF) is an important component of high-quality corporate governance. We study how the head of internal audit perceives the executive management team and the audit committee to rely on the IAF’s work. It is not obvious from prior work or professional anecdotes whether the IAF satisfies the needs of both groups. If multiple factors influence the IAF’s work, chief audit executives (CAEs) may find themselves in a situation with competing demands, which could then compromise quality for all stakeholders. Based on a unique dataset from CAEs, two logistic regression models identify factors that influence the degree to which IAF’s results are perceived as being used by both executive management and the audit committee. The results show the existence of various factors that are relevant either to both groups (e.g., strategic project reports and IAF quality) or to only one (e.g., only audit committees are interested in risk management reports while only executive management teams are interested in internal control reports), depending on whether the IAF focuses on assurance or consulting work.

Introduction

In order to fulfill its duties as an objective and independent provider of assurance and consulting services, the internal audit function (IAF) reports to both executive management and the audit committee, both of whom need specific information provided by the IAF (Abbott, Parker, & Peters, 2010). However, these two stakeholders differ in their specific duties; thus, their intended uses of IAF-provided information and their requests of the IAF differ. For example, executive management likely depends on the IAF’s work to help them minimize the company’s risks and to improve the operations of the company; that is, they have a managerial focus. On the other hand, the interests of the audit committee are likely more focused on monitoring; that is, they seek stronger internal controls, regulatory compliance, or quality of financial reporting (e.g., Paape, Scheffe, & Snoep, 2003). The divergent objectives of these two stakeholders present potential confusion and can divide the attention of the IAF. In recent studies by two Big 4 accounting firms, IAF stakeholders (specifically audit committees, boards of directors, and senior executives) note a decreased satisfaction with their IAFs (KPMG, 2017; PwC, 2017), reporting overall satisfaction at only 44%, the lowest number reported since the measure has been collected. Among those respondents who report some satisfaction with IAF results, more than half still expect more from their IAF (PwC, 2017). Specifically, these stakeholders reported wanting more value in the areas of potential revenue enhancements, cost savings, or smarter capital expenditures. These findings indicate that both executive management and audit committees expect more; however, because both stakeholders have different expectations of IAFs (Lourens & Coetzee, 2018), IAFs might struggle to decide how to satisfy both groups, given their limited resources. To help internal audit better serve both stakeholders, it is important to understand what each group values about IAF work. Prior research has not examined what factors are associated with greater use of internal audit results by executive management teams and audit committees.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد.