The quest for environmental sustainability is inextricably linked to the monitoring service. Monitoring is critical for environmental management. Environmental management decisions are dependent on monitoring; the same holds for reporting for legal purposes and reporting the environmental performance (Verschoor and Reijnders, 2001). Companies, life cycles, footprints, indicators, systems even whole cities and countries are subject of various monitoring activities according to achieve and maintain sustainable development (Kostev
sek et al., 2015). Increasing efforts and resources have been devoted to research during environmental studies, including the assessment of various harmful impacts (
Cu
cek et al., 2012). But environmental monitoring is not only limited to those impacts. Sustainability must be addressed from interdisciplinary and multi-cultural perspectives (Duic et al., 2015). It is capable to reach much more innovative achievements like for example automated registration of potential locations for solar energy production (Szabo et al., 2016 ), integrate various indicators into “families” (Galli et al., 2012) or recently developed interesting and promising cities’ sustainability benchmarking index (Kılkıs, 2015). All of this requires gathering great amount of various data. Availability of the updated data is becoming increasingly important in order to allow a rigorous analysis (Allouhi et al., 2015). The issue of multirotor flying devices was taken up at the beginning of the twentieth century. As reported by Leishman (2006), one of the first documented prototypes, able to take off was Jeromede Bothezat’s Flying Octopus. Multicopters are similar to helicopters but should be treated as a separate group of flying objects. They have higher maneuverability due to engines with fixed pitch propeller. Each motor is controlled independently by the flight controller. What allowed to resign from the precise helicopter rotor standard mechanics.