مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | افزایش ارزش تولید محتوا در پروژه های حرفه ای خدمات: نقش حرفه ای ها، مشتریان و تعاملات موثر آنها |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Enhancing value co-creation in professional service projects: The roles of professionals, clients and their effective interactions |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 17 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.979 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 121 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 2.203 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0263-7863 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | دارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت پروژه، بازاریابی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله بین المللی مدیریت پروژه-International Journal of Project Management |
دانشگاه | Research School of Management, ANU College of Business and Economics, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia |
کلمات کلیدی | منطق خدمات غالب، تولید محتوا ارزشی، پروژه های خدمات حرفه ای، مشتریان، تعاملات بین مشتری و حرفه ای |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Service-dominant logic; Value co-creation; Professional service projects; Professionals; Clients; Professional–client interactions |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.04.001 |
کد محصول | E12204 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical background 3. Research methdology and results 4. Discussion and implications 5. Limitations and future research 6. Conclusions Appendix A. Survey items used in Study 2 References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Projects are value creation mechanisms for organizations. In this paper, we build on service-dominant logic theory to theorize how value is perceived and co-created by service providers and clients in professional service projects. From two studies, we found that for service providers to create their value, particularly non-monetary value (e.g., enhanced reputation), client values (e.g., solving a business problem) must first be generated. The results further highlight the importance of reciprocal interactions between service providers and their clients in co-creating value for both parties. Service providers’ professional knowledge and competence and their clients’ levels of professional knowledge and motivation to interact are critical to enable effective interactions. However, the influence of service providers’ professional ethics and clients’ trust in professionals on project value co-creation is more complex than theoretically predicted. This paper advances the project value creation literature by providing a more holistic view of what value means for different stakeholders, how it is created, and by whom. Introduction Projects are increasingly recognized as value creation mechanisms in organizations (Laursen and Svejvig, 2016). Consequently, significant research efforts have been devoted to understanding project value (or benefits) and value creation (Martinsuo et al., 2019). These prior studies can be broadly categorized into three themes. The first theme defines (or redefines) relevant concepts, such as benefits, value, and project success, used in project value-focused research (Chang et al., 2013; Green and Sergeeva, 2019; Zwikael and Smyrk, 2012). The second theme, which is arguably supported by the richest body of literature, investigates value creation processes (Matinheikki et al., 2016; Pargar et al., 2019) and stakeholders’ involvement in project lifecycles (Keeys and Huemann, 2017; Vuorinen and Martinsuo, 2019; Zwikael and Meredith, 2018). The third theme takes a broader perspective to investigate value creation at program, portfolio, and organizational levels (Martinsuo and Hoverfält, 2018; Riis et al., 2019). |