مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | براکی تراپی در تسکین سرطان مری: مؤثر اما غیر عملی؟ |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Brachytherapy in the Palliation of Oesophageal Cancer: Effective but Impractical? |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 7 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | MedLine – Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.963 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 68 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.123 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0936-6555 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | پزشکی |
گرایش های مرتبط | گوارش و کبد، آسیب شناسی پزشکی، خون و آنکولوژی، ایمنی شناسی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | آنکولوژی بالینی – Clinical Oncology |
دانشگاه | Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK |
کلمات کلیدی | براکی تراپی، دیسفاژی، سرطان مری، مراقبت تسکینی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Brachytherapy، dysphagia، oesophageal cancer، palliative care |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.03.045 |
کد محصول | E12991 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
Statement of Search Strategies Used and Sources of Information Introduction The Clinical Evidence for Brachytherapy as a Treatment for Dysphagia Cost Comparison of Brachytherapy and Stent Insertion Why is Brachytherapy so Infrequently Used and Should it be Used More? Conclusions and Recommendations References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract ysphagia in people with advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated by oesophageal stents, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraluminal brachytherapy. Despite guidelines recommending brachytherapy for patients with a predicted life expectancy exceeding 3 months, its uptake in the UK has been limited. Here we examine the strength of the evidence supporting the use of brachytherapy compared with oesophageal stents and EBRT and possible reasons for its limited uptake. Trials and observational studies suggest brachytherapy alone confers a benefit to patients, but its impact is less immediate than oesophageal stents; the evidence on effectiveness and value-for-money is limited. Moreover, stronger evidence will probably be insufficient to increase uptake, due to the extra complexity of delivery compared with stents and EBRT and a lack of experience among specialists. Introduction People with oesophageal cancer often have a poor prognosis because they are diagnosed with advanced disease or are too frail to undergo curative treatment. For these reasons, oesophageal cancer is the seventh most common cause of death due to cancer in the UK despite being the 13th most common type of tumour [1]. Most patients are unsuitable for curative treatment and the aim of their treatment is primarily either to extend life expectancy or reduce the impact of symptoms on quality of life, although the latter is perhaps the dominant consideration. Among patients with stage IV cancer, recent population-based figures show life expectancy remains poor, with 1-year relative survival rates of 25.3 and 21.3% for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma tumours, respectively [2]. Dysphagia is a common, debilitating symptom among patients with advanced oesophageal cancer and can present with various stages of severity, such as restricting patients to eating specific solids, to swallowing only liquids or preventing anything from being ingested orally. Various therapies are available to alleviate dysphagia, including oesophageal stent insertion, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, laser therapy, photodynamic therapy and argon plasma coagulation [3]. |