مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | شارژ ماشین های برقی و انگیزه کاربر نهایی برای انعطاف پذیری: یک مورد مطالعه از کشور نروژ |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Electric vehicle charging and end-user motivation for flexibility: a case study from Norway |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2021 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 10 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه اسپرینگر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | JCR – Master Journal List – Scopus – DOAJ |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.779 در سال 2020 |
شاخص H_index | 25 در سال 2021 |
شاخص SJR | 0.747 در سال 2020 |
شناسه ISSN | 2192-0567 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2020 |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی برق، مهندسی کامپیوتر |
گرایش های مرتبط | ماشین های الکتریکی، هوش ماشین و رباتیک، هوش مصنوعی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | انرژی، پایداری و جامعه – Energy, Sustainability and Society |
دانشگاه | , Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway |
کلمات کلیدی | انعطاف پذیری، کابران نهایی، ماشین های برقی، شارژ هوشمند، نظریه بومی سازی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Flexibility, End users, Electric vehicles, Smart charging, Domestication theory |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00319-z |
کد محصول | E15956 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract Introduction Domestication of the smart home charger Method and pilot description Results and interpretation: domesticating smart charging—four motivations Discussion Conclusions Availability of data and materials References Acknowledgements Funding Author information Ethics declarations Additional information Rights and permissions About this article References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Background Norway is currently in the process of replacing internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles with electric vehicles (EVs). A steadily increasing number of EVs being charged in the evening when the demand peaks are already high has added to the strain on local electricity grids. Smart charging is proposed as a solution to peak-load challenges of this kind, as it can delay charging until evenings and nights when demand peaks are generally low. However, current knowledge of the preferences and motivations of EV owners regarding the installation and use of smart chargers is lacking. Accordingly, the study aims to contribute an improved understanding in this respect. Methods The authors conducted a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews, in which they gained information on householder’s experiences following their participation in a pilot project to test smart charging of EVs. The interviews explored the interviewees’ motivation for participating in the project, their experiences of using and charging EVs, and their thoughts on flexibility in the timing of EV charging. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, after which a domestication theory approach was employed to perform an in-depth analysis of the interview data. Results The analysis of the interviews revealed that the study participants had four motivations for participating in the smart charging demonstration project and engaging in the further use of smart charging: (1) the fire-safety aspect and speed of charging devices for EVs was better than charging from a socket; (2) they derived a broader interest in and more joy from using smart home technology; (3) attractive practical and economic benefits; and (4) the flexibility offered by smart charging had the potential to have a positive impact on physical comfort. Conclusions The study revealed key domestication processes unfolding in the Norwegian energy transition with the increasing numbers of EVs and the corresponding grid peaks. The findings clearly indicate that users’ motivations go much further than simple economic rationalization, which should be of interest to policymakers, smart home developers, and all others that work with end-user flexibility in the grid. |