مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد اثربخشی درمان مبتنی بر ذهن آگاهی و درمان شناختی-رفتاری برای افسردگی در کارآزمایی های تصادفی سازی – الزویر 2023

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله مقایسه اثربخشی درمان مبتنی بر ذهن آگاهی و درمان شناختی-رفتاری برای افسردگی در کارآزمایی های تصادفی سازی و کنترل شده سر به سر: مروری سیستماتیک و متاآنالیز هم ارزی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Comparing the efficacy of mindfulness-based therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in head-to-head randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis of equivalence
نشریه الزویر
انتشار مقاله سال 2023
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی 13 صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله مروری (Review Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس نمیباشد
نمایه (index) JCR – Master Journal List – Scopus – Medline
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
10.750 در سال 2020
شاخص H_index 226 در سال 2022
شاخص SJR 4.466 در سال 2020
شناسه ISSN 1873-7811
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q1 در سال 2020
فرضیه ندارد
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر ندارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط روانشناسی
گرایش های مرتبط روانشناسی بالینی
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله  بررسی روانشناسی بالینی – Clinical Psychology Review
دانشگاه Department of Adult Psychiatry, Volda Hospital, Volda, Norway
کلمات کلیدی اختلالات عاطفی – درمان روان شناختی – روان درمانی – مداخلات مبتنی بر ذهن آگاهی – بزرگسالان
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Affective disorders – Psychological treatment – Psychotherapy – Mindfulness-based interventions – Adults
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102234
لینک سایت مرجع https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735822001192
کد محصول e17315
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
1 Introduction
2 Methods
3 Results
4 Discussion
5 Conclusion
Role of funding sources
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Declaration of Competing Interest
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Data availability
References

بخشی از متن مقاله:

Abstract

Background

     While Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is recommended as first-line treatment for depression, a significant minority do not show an adequate treatment response. Despite evidence for the efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Therapies (MBT) both in treating current depression and preventing relapse, it remains unknown whether MBT and CBT are equivalent in the treatment of current depression.

Methods

     Five databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing MBT with CBT and including depression as primary or secondary outcome.

Results

     When pooling the results of 30 independent RCTs with a total of 2750 participants, MBT and CBT were statistically significantly equivalent at both post-intervention (Hedges’s g = −0.009; p < .001) and follow-up (g = −0.033; p = .001). Supplementary Bayesian analyses provided further support for the alternative hypothesis of no difference between MBT and CBT. When exploring possible sources of heterogeneity, the differences at follow-up were smaller between CBT and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) than between CBT and mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) (Slope = 0.37;p = .022).

Conclusion

     The currently available evidence suggests that that MBT and CBT are equally efficacious in treating current adult depression. It remains unclear whether the similar effects of the two intervention types are due to different mechanisms or common factors.

Introduction

     Depression is one of the most common mental disorders worldwide, and it is estimated that around 280 million people suffer from depression at any time (World Health Organization, 2021). Depression affects not only the depressed individual and his or her immediate family but also has consequences for society at large (Lépine & Briley, 2011). Due to impaired functioning and early mortality, depression is an economic burden in terms of reduced or lost work and increased use of health care services (Lépine & Briley, 2011; P. S. Wang, Simon, & Kessler, 2003). The World_Health_Organization (2021) considers depression to be a substantial contributor to global disability, confirming the severe negative impact of depression.

     Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has proven efficacious in the treatment of depression (e.g., Butler, Chapman, Forman, & Beck, 2006; Cuijpers et al., 2013) and is recommended as a first-line psychological treatment for depression (American Psychological Association, 2019; The_National_Institute_for_Health_and_Care_Excellence, 2009). However, many patients relapse or continue to show residual symptoms (Paykel, 2007; Thase et al., 1992; Vittengl, Clark, Dunn, & Jarrett, 2007) or continue to experience residual symptoms (Taylor, Walters, Vittengl, Krebaum, & Jarrett, 2010). During the last two decades, mindfulness-based therapies (MBT) have received increased attention as possible interventions for depression, and the results of several meta-analyses provide support for the efficacy of MBT in treating current adult depression, e.g. (Goldberg et al., 2018; Khoury et al., 2013; Y.-Y. Wang et al., 2018). Mindfulness has been defined as \the awareness that emerges through paying attention on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally to the unfolding of experience moment by moment” (J. Kabat-Zinn, 2003). The two most investigated MBTs are mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) (Kabat-Zinn, 1990) and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) (Segal, Williams, & Teasdale, 2012). Both teach mindfulness meditation techniques to help individuals become aware of their thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations in the present moment and to subsequently help them change how they relate to these experiences. The MBSR program was developed for people with chronic illnesses and stress-related disorders, and is an eight-week course consisting of eight weekly 2.5-h group sessions and a silent retreat day, with focus on systematic training in mindfulness (Kabat-Zinn, 1990). In addition, the participants engage in home practice between sessions, including both formal (e.g., body scan) and informal practice (e.g., mindful awareness to everyday activities).

Conclusion

     Taken together, the present study fills a gap in the literature by systematically reviewing RCTs that have directly compared the efficacy of MBT and CBT for adult depression and by conducting a meta-analysis of equivalence showing not only that MBT and CBT did not differ in their effects but also that they were statistically significantly equivalent. While the results of the available studies do not allow a conclusion that the effects of the two therapies stem from common factors, the equivalent efficacy of MBT and CBT in treating depression opens up for increased flexibility in the choice of treatment.

Role of funding sources

     TrygFonden (Denmark), grant number: 7-12.0736, funded EN. The remaining authors did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors for this research.

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

دکمه بازگشت به بالا