مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تاثیر پروفیلاکسی آنتی بیوتیک غیر سفالوسپورینی بر عفونت مفصلی بعد از جراحی کارگذاری مفصل در بدن: یک مطالعه گذشته نگر با پیگیری 1 ساله |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Effect of non-cephalosporin antibiotic prophylaxis on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection after total joint replacement surgery: a retrospective study with a 1-year follow-up |
نشریه | الزویر |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2023 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 4 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله کوتاه (Short communication) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR – DOAJ – PubMed Central |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.393 در سال 2022 |
شاخص H_index | 10 در سال 2023 |
شاخص SJR | 0.544 در سال 2022 |
شناسه ISSN | 2590-0889 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q2 در سال 2022 |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | پزشکی |
گرایش های مرتبط | ارتوپدی – بیماری های عفونی و گرمسیری |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | جلوگیری از عفونت در عمل – Infection Prevention in Practice |
دانشگاه | ampere University, Finland |
کلمات کلیدی | عفونت مفصل مصنوعی، پروفیلاکسی آنتی بیوتیک، سفالوسپورین |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Prosthetic joint infection, Antibiotic prophylaxis, Cephalosporins |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100285 |
لینک سایت مرجع | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000185 |
کد محصول | e17568 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Summary Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conflicts of interest CRediT author statement References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Summary Background
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Introduction Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most feared complications after prosthetic joint surgery and therefore it is essential to prevent them. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has a well-established role in the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) related to prosthetic joint surgery. First- or second-generation cephalosporins are recommended as first-line prophylactic antibiotics. [1].
The most common reasons to use non-cephalosporin prophylactic antibiotics are reported penicillin allergy and carriage of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [1]. The prevalence of a reported penicillin allergy among patients with prosthetic joint surgery has been between 2.5–17% [[2], [3], [4], [5]]. Cephalosporins are often avoided and other prophylactic antibiotics, such as clindamycin or vancomycin, are given prior to joint replacement surgery to patients with a reported penicillin allergy [2,4].
Studies have shown an association between a reported penicillin or beta-lactam allergy and an increased risk of SSI after joint replacement surgery [5], even though this association has not been evident in all studies [2]. The increased risk for SSI associated with reported penicillin allergy is postulated to be due to the use of non-cephalosporin prophylactic antibiotics [6]. The risk for infection after prosthetic joint surgery has been shown to be higher when clindamycin has been compared with cloxacillin [7] and when vancomycin has been compared with cefazolin [4,8]. Wyles et al. showed that the risk for infection after prosthetic joint surgery was significantly higher when non-cefazolin prophylactic antibiotics were used [3].
Results The study population consisted of 27,220 primary joint replacement surgeries performed on 22,497 patients. Of these surgeries, 12,452 (46%) were hip replacements and 14 768 (54%) were knee replacements. In addition, 1450 (5%) of the joint replacement surgeries were bilateral.
vvCefuroxime was used as prophylaxis in 26,467 operations (97.2%), other antibiotics were used as follows: clindamycin 654 (2.4%), vancomycin 72 (0.3%) and other antibiotics in 27 (0.1%) operations. The proportion of women was higher, and patients were slightly younger, had a higher BMI and higher ASA scores among those receiving non-cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis than those receiving cefuroxime (Table I). Surgeries with non-cefuroxime antibiotic prophylaxis were longer in duration than those with cefuroxime prophylaxis (Table I). |