مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | ارزیابی چرخه عمر معادن زغال سنگ زیرزمینی در چین |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Life cycle assessment of underground coal mining in China |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2022 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 10 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR – Medline |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
7.956 در سال 2020 |
شاخص H_index | 244 در سال 2021 |
شاخص SJR | 1.795 در سال 2020 |
شناسه ISSN | 0048-9697 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2020 |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی معدن |
گرایش های مرتبط | استخراج معدن |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | علوم کامل زیست محیطی – Science of The Total Environment |
دانشگاه | دانشکده منابع و مهندسی ایمنی، دانشگاه مرکزی جنوبی، چانگشا، هونان، چین |
کلمات کلیدی | ارزیابی طول عمر، تولید زغال سنگ، اثرات زیست محیطی، کاهش فسیل، اقدامات فنی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Life cycle assessment – Coal production – Environmental impacts – Fossil depletion – Technical measures |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150231 |
کد محصول | E15688 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Highlights Abstract Graphical abstract Keywords 1. Introduction 2. Materials and methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion CRediT authorship contribution statement Declaration of competing interest Acknowledgments References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Coal is not only the main fossil fuel in China but also a pollution source. To evaluate the impact of coal production on the environment, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted on the mining process of a typical coal mine in China by using the SimaPro 9.0.0 software. The Ecoinvent v3 database was used to provide the background data, and midpoint results with uncertainty information were calculated using the ReCiPe Midpoint (H) method. After normalising the midpoint results, fossil depletion was identified as the most predominant environmental impact category, followed by marine ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, climate change, freshwater eutrophication, and human toxicity. The contribution analysis indicates that coal mining activities, consumption of steel and electricity, and mine ventilation are the key processes causing the above-mentioned environmental impact categories, which should be paid special attention. According to the sensitivity analysis, the primary countermeasures for addressing the environmental issues are to reduce the mining activities and improve the efficiency of coal mining and utilisation. In addition, the quantitative and comparative analyses show that the gas extraction production mode is beneficial to the environment. Finally, technical measures were proposed to promote green and sustainable development of the coal industry. This research can provide guidance for ensuring national energy security and promoting healthy development of the national economy. 1. Introduction Since 2012, the annual output of raw coal in China has remained at 3.41 to 3.97 billion tonnes (SCIO, 2020). In 2020, coal accounted for 56.8% of the primary energy consumption (NBSPRC, 2021). In the next five years, coal is still expected to account for more than half of the primary energy consumption in China. It is estimated that by 2025, the coal consumption will be approximately 4.1 billion tonnes, accounting for approximately 52% (Kang, 2019). With the implementation of reforms in the energy structure, the proportion of coal consumption in China has declined, but the coal-based energy structure is expected to remain for a long time (Yuan et al., 2016). This huge energy consumption will result in a series of environmental problems, seriously threatening the ecological environment and human health. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an effective tool for quantifying product sustainability. Because it can quantitatively describe the burden of production on the environment (ISO 14040, 2006), it has been widely used in the industrial, agricultural, and other fields, as indicated in the studies by Nabavi-Pelesaraei et al. (2019), Khanali et al. (2021), Hou et al. (2016), and Saber et al. (2021). These studies have provided important theoretical support for sustainable development. By reviewing the literature, it was found that most LCA studies on coal focused on the consumption scenario, and there were only few studies concerning production processes. Peng et al. (2021) adopted the LCA method to assess volatile organic compound emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Tong et al. (2021) conducted a LCA on three different technical coal-to-liquid routes. Li et al. (2019) studied the impact of greenhouse gases on the life cycle of direct chemical recycling of coal for hydrogen production. Some scholars have analysed the environmental pollution caused by coal tailings (Adiansyah et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2020). The above-mentioned studies obtained many useful conclusions. Because coal production is the second largest source of emissions after coal consumption (Aguirre-Villegas and Benson, 2017), the environmental pollution due to coal production cannot be ignored. |