مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد حاکمیت نوآوری مدل کسب و کار پایدار – الزویر ۲۰۲۳
مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | حاکمیت نوآوری مدل کسب و کار پایدار – یک رویکرد عادی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | The governance of sustainable business model innovation—An Ordonomic Approach |
نشریه | الزویر |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۲۳ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۲ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journal List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۳٫۱۹۶ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
شاخص H_index | ۶۰ در سال ۲۰۲۲ |
شاخص SJR | ۰٫۹۷۱ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
شناسه ISSN | ۱۸۷۳-۳۳۸۷ |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت کسب و کار – مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات – مدیریت استراتژیک |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مجله مدیریت اسکاندیناوی – Scandinavian Journal of Management |
دانشگاه | Chair of Economic Ethics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany |
کلمات کلیدی | نوآوری مدل کسب و کار پایدار – پایداری شرکتی – ارزش آفرینی پایدار – حکومت – اوردونومی – پتانسیل های برد-برد-برد مرتبه دوم |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Sustainable business model innovation – Corporate sustainability – Sustainable value creation – Governance – Ordonomics – Second-order win-win-win potentials |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101246 |
لینک سایت مرجع | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522122000537 |
کد محصول | e17313 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract ۱ Introduction ۲ Why SBMI is of vital importance for corporate sustainability ۳ The sustainability cube as a management tool for the governance of SBMI ۴ Contributions to diverse literature streams on sustainability management ۵ Conclusion and outlook Funding CRediT authorship contribution statement Conflict of Interest References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract This paper develops an ordonomic approach to the governance of sustainable business model innovation (SBMI). We clarify the distinctive roles of optimization and governance for the management of sustainable value networks and develop a sustainability cube as a new management tool for the governance of SBMI. Our cube helps management to identify and overcome social dilemmas within value networks, i.e. to form and reform relevant business relationships, thus creating and tapping second-order win-win-win potentials. Furthermore, our cube encourages management to interpret negative externality problems as “missing markets”, i.e. as an entrepreneurial challenge and as a business opportunity to serve as yet unmet needs. Finally, our cube offers an avenue to develop and strengthen the specific management competencies that foster a successful governance of SBMI. Introduction After having promoted the sustainability concept of a “triple bottom line” (TBL) for 25 years, Elkington (2018) is rather disillusioned and (self-)critical of what, in effect, has become an accounting concept. Looking back, he clarifies his initial goal—and identifies what went wrong (para. 8, emphasis in original): “[T]he original idea was wider still, encouraging businesses to track and manage economic (not just financial), social, and environmental value added—or destroyed. … [T]he TBL wasn’t designed to be just an accounting tool. It was supposed to provoke deeper thinking about capitalism and its future, but many early adopters understood the concept as a balancing act, adopting a trade-off mentality.” He further elaborates (para. 13, emphasis in original): “TBL’s stated goal from the outset was system change—pushing toward the transformation of capitalism. … It was originally intended as a genetic code, a triple helix of change for tomorrow’s capitalism, with a focus … on breakthrough change, disruption, asymmetric growth (with unsustainable sectors actively sidelined), and the scaling of next-generation market solutions.” Looking ahead, he states (para. 16 f.): “[W]e need a new wave of TBL innovation and deployment. … Hence the need for a ‘recall.’ I hope that in another 25 years we can look back and point to this as the moment [we] started working toward a triple helix for value creation, a genetic code for tomorrow’s capitalism, spurring the regeneration of our economies, societies, and biosphere.” Conclusion and outlook This paper develops an ordonomic approach to the governance of SBMI. We clarify the distinctive roles of optimization and governance for the management of sustainable value networks and develop a sustainability cube as a new management tool for the governance of SBMI. Our cube helps management to identify and overcome social dilemmas within value networks, i.e. to form and reform relevant business relationships, thus creating and tapping second-order win-win-win potentials. Furthermore, our cube encourages management to interpret negative externality problems as “missing markets”, i.e. as an entrepreneurial challenge and as a business opportunity to serve as yet unmet needs. Finally, our cube helps management to develop and strengthen the specific competencies that foster a successful governance of SBMI. As an outlook, we would like to emphasize several limitations of our contribution in this paper, which may stimulate further research. First, we deliberately skipped an important aspect. Since we wanted to concentrate on sustainability opportunities beyond the organizational boundaries of the firm, we edited out the ordonomic strategy of individual self-commitments. We therefore concentrate on perceiving the organization and its interior structures as a monolithic block. On the one hand, this assumption needs to be highlighted as a serious limitation of our tool, but on the other hand it provides a vital starting point for complementary further research on intra-organizational challenges such as culture, mind-set, etc. (see e.g., Evans et al., 2017; Geissdoerfer et al., 2018) and tensions’ management in SBMI (see e.g., Schultz, 2022a). Hence, managers using the cube must be constantly aware of this blind spot. Further research could explore the possible interplay between the three commitment strategies (external relations management) embodied in the cube and the one we left out (internal relations management). For the latter, we would like to hint to an initial ordonomic contribution along those lines cf. Will and Pies (2018). |