مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تاثیر یک برنامه آموزشی زمانی شنیداری بر روان گفتاری کودکان مبتلا به لکنت رشدی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Effect of an Auditory Temporal Training Program on Speech Fluency of Children with Developmental Stuttering |
سال انتشار | 2023 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 15 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Master Journal List – Scopus – PubMed Central – ISC |
نوع مقاله |
ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
0.871 در سال 2022 |
شاخص H_index | 18 در سال 2023 |
شاخص SJR | 0.215 در سال 2022 |
شناسه ISSN | 1735-4668 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q3 در سال 2022 |
فرضیه | ندارد ☓ |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد ☓ |
پرسشنامه | ندارد ☓ |
متغیر | ندارد ☓ |
رفرنس | دارد ✓ |
رشته های مرتبط | روانشناسی – پزشکی |
گرایش های مرتبط | روانشناسی رشد – مغز و اعصاب – روانشناسی تربیتی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله مغز و اعصاب کودک ایران – Iranian Journal of Child Neurology |
دانشگاه | Department of Speech & Language Pathology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran |
کلمات کلیدی | آموزش شنوایی – آموزش زمانی شنیداری – اختلال پردازش شنوایی – لکنت رشدی – زمانبندی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Auditory training – Auditory temporal training – Auditory processing disorder – Developmental stuttering – Timing |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi | https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i1.35885 |
لینک سایت مرجع |
https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/ijcn/article/view/35885 |
کد محصول | e17390 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract Introduction Materials & Methods Results Discussion In Conclusion AcknAuthor’s Contribution owledgment Conflict of interest References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Objectives
Materials & Methods
Result
Conclusions
Introduction Stuttering is a well-known speech fluency disorder with primary symptoms such as involuntary and abnormal repetitions and prolongations of sounds, syllables, words, phrases, and silent pauses that disrupt the rhythmic flow of speech(1). With a prevalence rate of 2-5%, this disorder emerges mainly at 3-6 years of age nearby 1% of this population will continue to have persistent stuttering until adulthood (2). Stuttering is neurodevelopmentally (3), associated with several factors(4). Numerous studies and theories point to defective neural centers for speech control, auditory processing disorders, genetic and language impairments, and other cognitive, emotional, and social processing as the underlying causes of stuttering (5). Currently, the basic neurogenic knowledge of stuttering is not directly linked with clinical programs(6). More promising and effective management and treatment of stuttering appear to be more logically rooted in its potential neural mechanisms (6, 7). Several studies and theories highlight the auditory system, its associated processing, and its roles, which might be the structures linked with this disorder (8).
Results Demographic data for each group are shown in (Table 1). Children in both groups had a Stuttering Severity Instrument-3 (SSI-3) range of very mild to moderate (score 8-27). 3.1. Analyzing the Effect of Auditory Temporal Training on ATP Test Scores In this section, data related to ATP tests before, immediately, and three months after auditory temporal training are compared between the intervention and control groups. 3.1.1. Duration pattern test Table 2 shows a significant difference between the three interventions Duration pattern tests measurement levels (Table 2). The pairwise comparison test, by considering the Bonferroni adjustment indicated that the post-training (session 13) scores of the intervention group improved remarkably (right and left ear: P<0.001). An improvement was also observed in the control group, albeit non-significant (right ear: P=1.0, left ear: P=0.468). The analysis of the resulting stability revealed persistent improvement in the intervention group based on the post-training evaluation after three months (right ear: P=0.005, left ear: P=0.012). No significant difference was observed in the control group’s scores after three months (right ear: P=0.396, left ear: P=1.0). The between-subject primary effect test, found a significant difference between the intervention and control groups across the three measurement levels (P<0.001). The interaction of time and group was substantial (P<0.001) (Table 2). |