مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد دیابت و ریسک نارسایی قلبی در افراد مبتلا و بدون بیماری های قبلی عروقی – الزویر 2024

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله دیابت و ریسک نارسایی قلبی در افراد مبتلا و بدون بیماری های قبلی عروقی: بررسی اصولی و فراتحلیل
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Diabetes and risk of heart failure in people with and without cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
نشریه الزویر
انتشار مقاله سال 2024
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی 8 صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس نمیباشد
نمایه (index) scopus – master journals List – JCR – MedLine
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
4.659 در سال 2022
شاخص H_index 131 در سال 2023
شاخص SJR 1.634 در سال 2022
شناسه ISSN 1872-8227
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q1 در سال 2022
فرضیه ندارد
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر ندارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط پزشکی
گرایش های مرتبط پزشکی داخلی – غدد و متابولیسم
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله  Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice – تحقیقات دیابت و شیوه بالینی
دانشگاه University of Leicester, UK
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111054
لینک سایت مرجع https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822723008173
کد محصول e17619
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
1 Introduction
2 Methods
3 Results
4 Discussion
Funding
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Declaration of competing interest
Acknowledgements
Appendix A Supplementary data
References

بخشی از متن مقاله:

Abstract

Background
People with diabetes have an increased risk of heart failure (HF), compared to those without diabetes. However, no comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis has explored whether these associations could differ in relation to prevalent cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Aims
To estimate the association between diabetes and incident heart failure (HF), compared to without diabetes, in individuals with and without CVD.

Methods
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for observational cohort studies from the earliest dates to 22nd March 2023. A random-effects model calculated the pooled relative risk (RR).

Results
Of 11,609 articles, 31 and 6 studies reported data in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) respectively. Individuals with T2D had an increased risk of HF irrespective of CVD prevalence: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.35–1.92) in those with CVD; 1.78 (1.60–1.99) without CVD; and 2.02 (1.75–2.33) with unspecified CVD prevalence. Meta-regression did not identify a significant difference comparing HF risk in T2D individuals with vs. without CVD (p = 0.232).

Conclusion
People with T2D, compared to those without diabetes, have similar increased risk of HF, regardless of CVD prevalence. Strategies proven to lower HF risk in T2D individuals should be prioritized for those with and without CVD.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) tend to exist as common comorbid conditions [1], with approximately 4.3 to 28 % of HF individuals with prevalent type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 12–57 % of T2D individuals presenting with HF [2]. People with diabetes also have an increased risk of HF, which subsequently increases their risk of hospitalizations [3], [4] and mortality [5], [6] to further burden global economic and healthcare resources [7]. Nearly 537 million adults are currently living with diabetes world-wide, estimated to rise to 643 million by 2030 [8]; HF currently affects 64.3 million people globally [9], predicted to rise by 50 % in the next 20 years [10]. Hence, early prevention and management strategies to lower HF risk in individuals with diabetes is of public health importance [11], [12]. This is further reinforced in evidence showing HF as the most common initial presentation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people with diabetes [13].

A previous meta-analysis from 2018 [14] showed that persons with diabetes have an increased risk of HF, relative to without diabetes (relative risk, RR: 2.06, 95 % confidence interval, CI: 1.73 to 2.46). However, this study pooled estimates from heterogeneous study designs (e.g., case-control and cohort), which could have led to biased estimates. To address this limitation, a recent 2020 meta-analysis [15], exclusively using data from observational cohort studies, reported that individuals with diabetes have an increased risk of new-onset HF, relative to without diabetes (RR: 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.96 to 2.34). However, the author’s included studies that did not adjust for at minimum age and sex, which could have led to biased results. The study also found an attenuated association when restricting the population to individuals with prevalent coronary heart disease (CHD) (RR: 1.94, 95 % CI: 1.77 to 2.12) [15]. It remains unclear whether, and to what extent, the association between diabetes and incident HF could differ in populations with and without broad CVD.

Results

3.1. Study characteristics
Of the 11,609 studies, 31 articles [6,13,22–50] consisting of 34 cohorts for T2D were identified (prevalent CVD: 11; without CVD: 12; unspecified CVD prevalence: 11) and 6 articles [6,24,27,29,46,51] consisting of 7 cohorts were identified for T1D (prevalent CVD: 1; without CVD: 3; unspecified CVD prevalence: 3) (Fig. 1). The total number of individuals were 501,536 for cohorts of T2D with CVD, 27,855,580 for T2D without CVD, 9,046,486 for T2D with unspecified CVD prevalence; 251,538 for T1D with CVD, 18,580,888 for T1D without CVD, and 3,690,911 for T1D unspecified CVD prevalence (Table S3). Of studies investigating T2D, mean age was 57.99, 61.25 and 64.74 in those with CVD, without CVD and unspecified CVD prevalence respectively. Mean baseline recruitment (years) was higher in those with prevalent CVD (2007), compared to without CVD (2004) and unspecified CVD (2001). Most studies were from Europe at 45.45 %, 50.00 % and 54.55 % in those with CVD, without CVD and unspecified CVD prevalence. In T2D, most studies had low risk of bias, with 90.91 %, 91.67 % and 72.73 % reported in populations with CVD, without CVD, and unspecified CVD prevalence. Table S3 summarises the characteristics of all included studies.

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

دکمه بازگشت به بالا