مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | یک کار تجربی برای اندازه گیری پرخاشگری کنشی تحت شرایط تشویقی: وظیفه پاداش و مداخله |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | An experimental task to measure proactive aggression under incentive condition: A Reward-Interference Task |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 13 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.383 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 141 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.245 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0191-8869 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | روانشناسی |
گرایش های مرتبط | روانشناسی عمومی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences |
دانشگاه | Research Center of Psychology and Social Development, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China |
کلمات کلیدی | پرخاشگری کنشی، وظیفه پاداش و مداخله (RIT)، پرسشنامه انگیزشی مداخله ای / غیر مداخله ای (INIMQ)، شرایط تشویقی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Proactive aggression، Reward-Interference Task (RIT)، Interference/Non-interference Motivation Questionnaire (INIMQ)، Incentive conditions |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.001 |
کد محصول | E13710 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Study 1 3. Study 2 4. Study 3 5. Study 4 6. General discussion Ethical statement Declaration of Competing Interest Acknowledgments Appendix A Appendix B. The items of Interference/Non-interference Motivation Questionnaire References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Proactive aggression refers to attaining personal goals or gains through aggressive means with prior deliberation and moral disengagement, and it can occur without provocation and with a low-level of anger arousal. The current study introduces a new task, a Reward-Interference Task (RIT), to induce and measure proactive aggression in the laboratory under incentive conditions and develops a task-related questionnaire (Interference/ Non-interference Motivation Questionnaire, INIMQ) through four experiments. The findings reveal that instrumental motivation toward incentives and moral motivation (moral disengagement and moral inhibition) were the main motivations for participants to attack opponents during the RIT. The validity and reliability of the INIMQ were acceptable, and the RIT had good internal consistency, adequate convergence, and discriminant validity. The present results show that the RIT is a valid tool for inducing and measuring proactive aggressive behavior under incentive conditions. Introduction Aggression is any behavior that causes physical or psychological harm to another individual (Anderson & Bushman, 2002). Aggressive behavior can pose a threat to individual health, human collaboration, social economy, and safety (Blair, 2013; Brugman et al., 2017; Carroll & McCarthy, 2018). Aggression is a heterogeneous concept and can be divided into different categories, for example, verbal, physical and indirect aggression (Björkqvist, Lagerspetz, & Kaukiainen, 1992; Crick & Bigbee, 1998). Another widely accepted classification is proactive and reactive aggression, based on motivation (Dambacher et al., 2015; Dodge & Coie, 1987; Dodge, Lochman, Harnish, Bates, & Pettit, 1997; Wrangham, 2018). Previous studies have suggested that proactive and reactive aggression have different cognitive, physiological, and neurobiological mechanisms and etiologies (Dambacher et al., 2015; Hubbard, McAuliffe, Morrow, & Romano, 2010; Nelson & Trainor, 2007; Wrangham, 2018). Proactive aggression refers to obtaining personal goals or gains through aggressive means with prior deliberation and moral disengagement and it can occur without provocation and with a low-level of emotional arousal (Babcock, Tharp, Sharp, Heppner, & Stanford, 2014; Smeijers, Brugman, von Borries, Verkes, & Bulten, 2018). The core goal of proactive aggression is obtaining self-interest rather than harming the target (Anderson & Bushman, 2002). Stalking, bullying, and premeditated crimes are typical forms of proactive aggression (Wrangham, 2018). |