مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد قدرت تفکر با پیش بینی تحت تاثیر قرار گرفتگی – الزویر ۲۰۱۹

elsevier

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله قدرت تفکر و بی پردگی با پیش بینی متمایز تحت تاثیر قرار گرفتگی: بافت های شناختی توانایی درک شده و هدفمند
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Intellect and openness differentially predict affect: Perceived and objective cognitive ability contexts
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۹
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۸ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله مقاله پژوهشی (Research article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس نمیباشد
نمایه (index) scopus – master journals – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) ۱٫۹۶۷ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index ۱۲۹ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شاخص SJR ۱٫۱۸۱ در سال ۲۰۱۹
رشته های مرتبط روانشناسی
گرایش های مرتبط روانشناسی بالینی
نوع ارائه مقاله ژورنال
مجله / کنفرانس شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences
دانشگاه Faculty of Psychology – University of Warsaw – Warsaw – Poland
کلمات کلیدی توانایی، تاثیر، هوش، حالت، بی پرده بودن، هوش، تندرستی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Ability, Affect, Intellect, Mood, Openness, Intelligence, Wellbeing
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.08.001
کد محصول E9407
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
۱ Introduction
۲ The current research
۳ Method
۴ Discussion
References

بخشی از متن مقاله:
ABSTRACT

The characteristics of Openness and Intellect suggest they may be differentially correlated with affect. In Study 1 (n = 224) we examined associations between Openness/Intellect and well-being. Additionally, we included variables related to ability perception: subjectively assessed intelligence and satisfaction with intelligence. In Study 2 (n = 216) we explored how Intellect/Openness predict subjective stress states related to performance of intelligence tests. Across studies, Intellect was consistently correlated with more positive affective states (mood and satisfaction), and lower stress. Openness – affect associations were inconsistent across studies, although Openness correlated with higher task-related worry and lower positive emotionality. Furthermore, in Study 1, satisfaction with one’s intelligence fully mediated associations between Intellect and measures of positive affect. In Study 2, worry mediated the association between Intellect and intelligence test performance.

Introduction

Numerous studies have shown the importance of personality for affect and subjective well-being (DeNeve & Cooper, 1998). Among various personality traits two especially have received the most theoretical and empirical attention: Extraversion and Neuroticism. Generally, both cognitive and affective components of well-being are associated with higher Extraversion and lower Neuroticism (Diener & Lucas, 1999). Specifically, it has been found that neurotics tend to experience negative affect and tense arousal, while extraverts have a tendency towards high levels of positive affect, hedonic tone, and energetic arousal (Matthews, Deary, & Whiteman, 2009; Thayer, 1989; Watson, 2000; Zajenkowski, Goryńska, & Winiewski, 2012). These associations are not surprising given that positive and negative emotions are defining characteristics of Extraversion and Neuroticism, respectively (see Watson, 2000). Besides Extraversion and Neuroticism, other major personality traits (such as Big Five) were also studied in the context of affective functioning but these studies have been less frequent. For instance, it was found that Agreeableness predicted higher positive affect (DeNeve & Cooper, 1998) and happiness (Steel, Schmidt, & Shultz, 2008), and Conscientiousness showed a weak positive correlation with life satisfaction (Weiss, Bates, & Luciano, 2008), positive affect (Soto, 2015) and energetic arousal (Goryńska, Winiewski, & Zajenkowski, 2015). In studies conducted so far, Openness did not exhibit robust relationships with affect and well-being. In some studies Openness correlated with higher positive affect, but it did not show significant associations with negative affect (Gutierrez, Jimenez, Hernandez, & Puente, 2005; Watson, 2000). Goryńska et al. (2015) measured mood of students six times during an academic semester and found that Openness occasionally predicted high levels of energetic arousal and hedonic tone. Furthermore, Matthews et al. (1999) found that Openness was associated with lower distress in the performance context. Although some evidence exists that Openness may be related to affect, some researchers claim that Openness has more in common with cognition than with affective states (Watson, 2000). In the current investigation we challenge this view by showing that the inconsistency in previous findings might be due to differing conceptualizations of Openness. Openness has been described variously by researchers as Culture, Openness to Experience, Intellect or Imagination (see e.g. DeYoung, 2014). Recent debate on this trait, however, revealed that Openness reflects two equally central aspects of the broader factor, which are correlated but separable. These aspects were identified as Openness and Intellect and the compound label of Openness/Intellect for the broad trait has been proposed (DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007). To avoid confusion with similar labels of other constructs, e.g., intelligence, DeYoung et al. (2007) provided clear definitions and operationalizations of the two aspects.

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *