مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تاثیر ریسک پذیری نوآوری های خدمات (الزویر)

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تاثیر ریسک پذیری نوآوری های خدمات (الزویر)

 

مشخصات مقاله
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی  ۱۱ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
منتشر شده در نشریه الزویر
نوع مقاله ISI
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration agencies
ترجمه عنوان مقاله بازخوانی تاثیر ریسک پذیری در مورد مزایای نوآوری های خدمات در مراکز اداره امور عمومی
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
رشته های مرتبط مدیریت و اقتصاد
گرایش های مرتبط مدیریت استراتژیک، اقتصاد بخش عمومی
مجله سیاست تحقیق – Research Policy
دانشگاه Australian Innovation Research Centre – University of Tasmania – Australia
کلمات کلیدی Australian Innovation Research Centre
کد محصول E5435
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
۱٫ Introduction

The pasttwo decades have witnessed an increasing policy interest in using innovation to improve the quality and efficiency of public services and thus to produce large benefits from social welfare maximization (Arundel et al., 2015; Brown and Osborne, 2013). Yet there is a broad understanding in the economics of innovation literature that the process of innovation carries significant risks and therefore requires organizations to tolerate both risk-taking and failure (Dodgson et al., 2005). Nevertheless, the pursuit of effi- ciency in public services often involves the reverse, with a stress on the downside of risk and support for a culture of risk aversion (Potts, 2009; Ritchie, 2014). In public services, an organizational culture of risk aversion is exacerbated by the vulnerability of users of public services and by the intense and relentless political and media scrutiny that such services receive (Borins, 2001; Chen and Bozeman, 2012). Other causes for a cautionary approach to risk-taking and failure include the difficulties of achieving (and measuring) innovation success (Hartley, 2005), bureaucratic norms that emphasize rules over results and processes over outcomes (Boyne, 2002), and the asymmetric relationship between those bearing the risk involved in innovation and those garnering the reward or incentive (Albury, 2005; Ritchie, 2014). As a result, a risk-averse culture is thought to act as a major impediment to innovation in public services (Brown and Osborne, 2013; Potts, 2009). Yetthis view, while widely embraced in the literature, has rarely been tested empirically. Several surveys of public managers have provided descriptive data showing that risk aversion is not a major barrier to the development of innovations (Bugge et al., 2011; Gallup Organization, 2011; UK National Audit Office (NAO), 2000), but none examined the effect of risk aversion on the benefits (or otherwise)frominnovation, or took a holistic approach to understand the configurations of conditions under which risk aversion can spur or stifle innovation success.

ثبت دیدگاه