مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 18 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه امرالد |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | The role of employee empowerment in the implementation of continuous improvement: Evidence from a case study of a financial services provider |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | نقش توانمندسازی کارکنان برای پیشرفت مستمر: یک ارائه دهنده خدمات مالی |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت منابع انسانی، مدیریت کسب و کار |
مجله | مجله بین المللی مدیریت عملیات و تولید – International Journal of Operations & Production Management |
دانشگاه | Institute of Business Administration – University of Rostock – Germany |
کلمات کلیدی | خدمات، مطالعه موردی، پیشرفت مستمر، خدمات مالی، توانمندسازی CI |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Service, Case study, Continuous improvement, Financial services, CI empowerment |
کد محصول | E6363 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
Today, few companies can survive in their market environment by maintaining their status quo (Kofoed et al., 2002; Swartling and Olausson, 2011). The ability of an organisation to stay flexible and responsive towards changing conditions requires continuous improvement (CI), leading to a dynamic company culture whose natural state is centred around incremental change and improvement (Hong et al., 2014). CI is defined as a bundle of principles, activities and tools within a company that aim to generate a planned and systematic improvement process of incremental and ongoing change (Lillrank et al., 2001; Kofoed et al., 2002). Through this ongoing change, CI aims to eliminate sources of imperfection within a company based on a high degree of employee participation to improve the quality of products and processes, and thus enhance the company’s performance (Imai, 1986; Kofoed et al., 2002; Wynder, 2008; Singh and Singh, 2013). However, after great enthusiasm at the beginning of a CI initiative, most programmes lose momentum and management realises that few of the intended principles and behavioural patterns have become institutionalised within the company (Swartling and Olausson, 2011). Among other potential reasons, studies by Kotter (1995), Lillrank et al. (2001), Angell and Corbett (2009) and Holtskog (2013) reveal that the successful institutionalisation of CI is closely linked to contributions made by individual employees. This contribution is not only dependent on one’s interest in participating, but is also determined by one’s personal abilities with regard to CI (e.g. Lok et al., 2005; Lam et al., 2015). While different terms can be found in relation to this phenomenon (e.g. “empowerment or engagement”; Rother, 2010, p. 176), we use the term “CI empowerment” as we adopt the concept of structural empowerment as the underlying theory (Kanter, 1993). CI empowerment covers the acquisition of required knowledge to undertake CI activities, as well as understanding of the CI goal to realise the impact of CI in one’s daily work (Lillrank et al., 2001). In addition, empowered employees feel supported by their management and colleagues to use their problem-solving skills actively, by openly talking about improvement opportunities and possible difficulties (Holtskog, 2013). |