مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 10 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه الزویر |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Privacy, consent and vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | حریم خصوصی، رضایت و شبکه های ادهاک وسیله نقلیه (VANETs) |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی فناوری اطلاعات، کامپیوتر و فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات |
گرایش های مرتبط | سامانه های شبکه ای، اینترنت و شبکه های گسترده، دیتا و امنیت اطلاعات |
مجله | بررسی قانون کامپیوتر و امنیت – Computer Law & Security Review |
دانشگاه | University of Ontario Institute of Technology – Canada |
کلمات کلیدی | حریم خصوصی، شبکه های حمل و نقل، قانون و سیاست |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Privacy, Vehicular networks, Law and policy |
کد محصول | E6394 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
Governments recognize that consumers have neither the time nor resources to compare different car safety features when making a purchasing decision. This being the case, the government establishes detailed regulations in order to ensure that minimum safety standards are being maintained.1 These regulations cover all aspects of vehicle manufacture from the installation of seatbelts to the size of tire rims. Vehicle safety standards are highly prescriptive such that automakers have limited discretion on how to interpret a given standard. This approach ensures that vehicles purchased by consumers are reasonably safe. By contrast, decisions regarding the sharing of data by consumers are not prescribed in the same manner. As a general rule, in data protection law it is the individual that exercises control over their personal information. The approach of individual control over personal data places limitations on limiting the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information.They are a central tenet of the highly influential OECD Fair Information Principles (FIPs).2 The FIPs stipulate that the reasons for the collection, use, disclosure and retention of personally identifiable information should be determined at or before the time of collection. Personal information should not be used or disclosed for purposes other than those for which it was collected, except with the consent of the individual or as authorized by law. The FIPs also specify that individuals should be enabled by organizations to play a participatory role in the lifecycle of their personal data and should be made aware of the practices associated with its use and disclosure.3 While the FIPs are a mainstay of data regulation, their specific implementation is subject to nuanced interpretation that is contextspecific. Moreover, advances in technology have enabled the shifting of information between contexts, and while scholarship in this area has typically focused on sensitive information as a primary concern, there has been a trend toward recognizing the relationship between information that is neither sensitive nor intimate but is rather culled from public spheres. |