مشخصات مقاله | |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 17 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
منتشر شده در | نشریه الزویر |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Melding traditional and progressive andragogy in marketing education, using the hermeneutic competency development strategy |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | ترکیب سنتی و پیشرفته در آموزش بازاریابی با استفاده از استراتژی توسعه شایستگی هرمنوتیک |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی |
مجله | مجله بازاریابی استرالیا – Australasian Marketing Journal |
دانشگاه | The Auckland University of Technology – New Zealand |
کلمات کلیدی | حضور، یادگیری تجربی، کلاس، یادگیری مبتنی بر نتیجه، نامزدی، استراتژی تدریس |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Attendance, experiential learning, flipped classroom, outcome-based learning, engagement, teaching strategy |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.05.004 |
کد محصول | E8348 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Introduction
Employers and educators alike call for work-ready, entry-level graduates who can understand and apply theory, frameworks and models in the workplace and who emerge from the classroom as socially skilled (i.e. understand specialized knowledge, are able to apply this knowledge), think critically for themselves, and are able to communicate marketing concepts effectively in business English. (Adler et al., 2004; De Villiers, 2013; De Villiers, 2010). At the same time, tertiary educators express concerns about dwindling class attendance, and question current teaching methods and how these are received by students (Dolnicar et al., 2009; Rodgers, 2001). The quality of the lecturer and/or the lecture content influence enjoyment of classes, class attendance, and learning outcomes (Dolnicar et al., 2009). Engaged students perform better and ultimately learn more; this engagement develops their technical and inter-personal skills, and enables them to perform better as employees (and employers). For example, Chylinski (2010, p.25) reports that using a small external incentive to increase in-class participation results in “a positive effect on students’ experience and perceived understanding of course material, as well as the social atmosphere during class discussions.” The big question is therefore “What really works in the classroom?” (Chall, 2000, p.1). Several studies report from various perspectives (student, facilitator, and industry) on the perceived effectiveness of a variety of learning methodologies (Karns, 1993; Morrison et al., 2003: Dolnicar et al., 2009; Lilly and Tippins, 2002; Chylinski, 2010), with some clearly focused on application to real-world problems (Di Conti, 2005; Mintzberg, 2004; Schank, 1995; Weick, 1996). However, despite the significance of the topic, there is still disagreement on which teaching methods are most effective in improving student engagement and learning. Further, to our knowledge there is no empirical work comparing the suggested teaching methods in tertiary undergraduate marketing classes, as applied to one key topic covering several learning outcomes. |