مشخصات مقاله | |
عنوان مقاله | The action research cycle reloaded: Conducting action research across buyer-supplier relationships |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | بازنگری چرخه تحقیقات عملیات: انجام تحقیقات عملی در سراسر روابط خریدار و تامین کننده |
فرمت مقاله | |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
نوع نگارش مقاله | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
سال انتشار | |
تعداد صفحات مقاله | 10 صفحه |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت و مهندسی صنایع |
گرایش های مرتبط | لجستیک و زنجیره تامین |
مجله |
مجله مدیریت خرید و تامین – Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management |
دانشگاه | دانشکده پلی تکنیک مدیریت میلان، ایتالیا |
کلمات کلیدی | تحقیق عملی، رابطه فروشنده با عرضه کننده، خرید، زنجیره تامین |
کد محصول | E4396 |
نشریه | نشریه الزویر |
لینک مقاله در سایت مرجع | لینک این مقاله در سایت الزویر (ساینس دایرکت) Sciencedirect – Elsevier |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
1. Introduction
Action research can be defined as an emergent inquiry process that integrates theory and action to couple scientific knowledge with existing organisational knowledge and to address real organisational problems together with the people of the system under inquiry (Coghlan, 2011; Shani and Pasmore, 1985; Rapaport, 1970; Lewin, 1947). It is a participatory and collaborative approach and is aimed at bringing change to organisations, developing competences, and contributing to scientific knowledge through a co-inquiry cyclical process (Coghlan and Shani, 2014; Reason and Bradbury, 2008; Shani and Pasmore, 1985). The epistemological underpinnings of action research are grounded in so-called Mode 2 knowledge production, defined and discussed as being antithetic to the traditional Mode 1 approach (Bartunek, 2011; Hodgkinson, 2001; MacLean et al., 2002; Tran- field and Starkey, 1998; Gibbons et al., 1994). In the Mode 1 approach, knowledge production occurs mainly as a result of an academic agenda. In the Mode 2 approach, knowledge production requires collaboration among academics and practitioners across different academic disciplines; it is developed through a knowledge-in-action process aimed at solving real and contextembedded issues and entails different methodologies (e.g., intervention research, clinical inquiry, appreciative inquiry, collaborative management research, action science, action learning). The two contrasting modes still animate a vibrant debate within the management research community that is centred on the rigour-relevance gap in managerial research (e.g., Kieser et al., 2015; Bartunek and Rynes, 2014; Hodgkinson and Rousseau, 2009; Shani et al., 2012; Kieser and Leiner, 2009; Bartunek and Rynes, 2006). On the one hand, some Mode 1 scholars claim that collaborating with practitioners may bring a lack of rigour to the research process (e.g., Kieser and Leiner, 2009). On the other hand, Mode 2 scholars show how, in the last decade, much of the management research appearing in top-rated journals has been of little relevance for most practitioners (e.g., MacLean et al., 2002; Bartunek, 2011; Zhang et al., 2015). |