مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | مطالعه ی تجربی و تجزیه و تحلیل بهره وری شغلی در محیط های کاری سمی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | An Empirical Study Analyzing Job Productivity in Toxic Workplace Environments |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 15 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه MDPI |
نوع نگارش مقاله | مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله |
ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.145 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 67 در سال 2018 |
شاخص SJR | 0.735 در سال 2018 |
رشته های مرتبط | پزشکی – مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | بهداشت حرفه ای – منابع انسانی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله بین المللی تحقیقات محیط زیست و بهداشت عمومی – International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
دانشگاه | Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University Shanghai, Shanghai 200051, China |
کلمات کلیدی | محیط کار سمی، استبداد در محل کار، بی کفایتی در محل کار، آزار و اذیت در محل کار، تحکیم و قلدری در محل کار، فرسودگی شغلی، بهره وری شغلی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | toxic workplace environment, workplace ostracism, workplace incivility, workplace harassment, workplace bullying, job burnout, job productivity |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051035 |
کد محصول | E11606 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Purpose: This empirical study aims to determine the effects of a toxic workplace environment, which can negatively impact the job productivity of an employee. Methodology: Three hundred questionnaires were randomly distributed among the staff members of seven private universities in Pakistan with a final response rate of 89%. For analysis purposes, AMOS 22 was used to study the direct and indirect effects of the toxic workplace environment on job productivity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted to ensure the convergent and discriminant validity of the factors, while the Hayes mediation approach was used to verify the mediating role of job burnout between the four dimensions of toxic workplace environment and job productivity. A toxic workplace with multiple dimensions, such as workplace ostracism, workplace incivility, workplace harassment, and workplace bullying, was used in this study. Findings: By using the multiple statistical tools and techniques, it has been proven that ostracism, incivility, harassment, and bullying have direct negative significant effects on job productivity, while job burnout was shown to be a statistical significant mediator between the dimensions of a toxic workplace environment and job productivity. Finally, we concluded that organizations need to eradicate the factors of toxic workplace environments to ensure their prosperity and success. Practical Implications: This study encourages managers, leaders, and top management to adopt appropriate policies for enhancing employees’ productivity. Limitations: This study was conducted by using a cross-sectional research design. Future research aims to expand the study by using a longitudinal research design.Introduction In the last few decades, organizations have had a single focus on “profit”, which was based solely on the stock prices. However, the outliers on the other side of the spectrum have been ignored, which are namely the “employees”, despite their established value as the most important assets of an organization [1]. An extensive review of the literature has determined that employees can be categorized as “stars”, who substantially increase organizational output and “toxic workers”, who simply are unsuitable for the organization [2]. Studies have shown that 80% of the issues and concerns regarding employees’ productivity are related to the type of work environment in which they operationalize their assigned tasks [3]. |