مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی و تنوع جنسیتی: بینشی از آسیا و اقیانوسیه |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2017 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 12 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه وایلی |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
4.918 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 49 در سال 2018 |
شاخص SJR | 1.706 در سال 2018 |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت منابع انسانی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management |
دانشگاه | Preston University, Islamabad Campus, Pakistan |
کلمات کلیدی | تنوع جنسیتی، نظریه ذینفعان، نظریه نهاد، مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکتی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | gender diversity, stakeholder theory, institutional theory, corporate social responsibility |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1400 |
کد محصول | E11740 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Introduction CAPITAL MARKET CONTESTANTS, PARTICULARLY INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS, SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISTS, AND FINANCIAL market speculators, are paying closer attention to corporate governance, corporate social responsibilities (CSR), and board gender diversity of listed firms, when pursuing both the financial and the social goals of their stakeholders. This framework is now widely acknowledged in the management literature for its descriptive accuracy, instrumental power, and normative validity (Donaldson & Preston, 1995; Campbell, 2006; Park & Park, 2016). Stakeholder theory emphasizes that an organization is part of a broader social system wherein the organization impacts, and is impacted by, other groups within society (Freeman & Reed, 1983; Freeman, 2001; Deegan, 2002). However specific stakeholder groups not only have differing expectations of how the organization should conduct its operation but vary in their ability to influence the organization to comply with their expectations. How an organization reacts to the impact of various stakeholder groups depends not only on the institutional environment in which it operates but the characteristics of its decision-makers. Nordberg (2008) argues that it is the responsibility of corporate boards to manage for the benefit of all stakeholders and that firms with a diversified board are better positioned to understand broader societal needs and create a positive firm image that enhances stakeholder outcomes. An important facet of board diversity receiving recent attention in the literature focuses on gender diversity. |