مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | سودمند بودن گزارش تصمیم گیری یکپارچه: دیدگاه های بازار سهام اصلی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Integrated reporting decision usefulness: Mainstream equity market views |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2018 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 15 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journal List |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.045 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 32 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 0.932 در سال 2017 |
شناسه ISSN | 0155-9982 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2017 |
رشته های مرتبط | حسابداری، اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط | حسابداری مالی، اقتصاد مالی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | انجمن حسابداری – Accounting Forum |
دانشگاه | Durham University Business School, Durham University, Queen’s Campus, H115, Wolfson Building, University Boulevard, Thornaby, Stockton on Tees, TS17 6BH, England, UK |
کلمات کلیدی | گزارش یکپارچه (IR)، مدیران سرمایه، تحلیلگران سهام، سودمندی تصمیم |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Integrated reporting (<IR>)، Fund managers، Equity analysts، Decision usefulness |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.01.005 |
کد محصول | E10904 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Literature review 3- Method 4- Findings 5- Concluding comments References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract The International Integrated Reporting (<IR>) Framework (2013) identified providers of financial capital as its primary users. This research provides evidence from 22 mainstream equity market actors, employed by global investment houses, regarding the decision usefulness of and resistances to <IR>, as a reporting framework. Despite institutional-level support for <IR>, the interviews reveal that its usefulness to fund managers and equity analysts is low. Concerns are evident over the Framework design and its relevance to more structural issues pertaining to equity market culture. The implication of this is that <IR> may become a reporting fad, not embedded into mainstream investment thinking. Introduction The International Integrated Reporting (< IR >) Framework was released by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) in December 2013. The Framework, which is non-mandatory, states that “the primary purpose of an integrated report is to explain to providers of financial capital how an organisation creates value over time” (IIRC, 2013a, p. 4). A fundamental concept within the < IR > Framework is the capitals model,1 which “provide[s] insight about the resources and relationships used and affected by an organization [in their value creation]” (IIRC, 2013a, p. 4). Further, it is claimed that the Framework reflects an “inclusive market-led approach” (IIRC, 2016) designed to “improve the quality of information available to providers of financial capital [such as the equity markets] to enable a more efficient and productive allocation of capital” (IIRC, 2013a, p. 2) and improve analyst investment assessments (EY, 2015). More recently, the IIRC (2015, p. 9) affirm that “…integrated reports give investors information more relevant to decisions over the longer term”. Despite such claims, academic studies (see Davies, Haldane, Nielsen, & Pezzini, 2014; Hughes, 2014) and practice based statements (see CFA, 2006, 2013, 2014; Kay, 2012) confirm short-termism in modern capital markets. This background raises concerns about the level of use and effectively the decision usefulness of < IR > from an equity investment perspective. Indeed, the IIRC itself recognises that < IR > is in a breakthrough phase (2014–17) in terms of investor demand and use (IIRC, 2014). |