مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد پاسخهای فیزیولوژیکی و عاطفی به استرس – الزویر 2020

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله پاسخهای فیزیولوژیکی و عاطفی به استرس ارزیابی در بزرگسالان جوان با مهار اجتماعی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Physiological and emotional responses to evaluative stress in socially inhibited young adults
انتشار مقاله سال 2020
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی 10 صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
2.828 در سال 2018
شاخص H_index 107 در سال 2019
شاخص SJR 1.481 در سال 2018
شناسه ISSN 0301-0511
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q2 در سال 2018
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر دارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط روانشناسی
گرایش های مرتبط روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی بالینی
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله / کنفرانس روانشناسی زیست شناختی – Biological Psychology
دانشگاه  CoRPS – Centre of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, The Netherlands
کلمات کلیدی استرس، مهار اجتماعی، واکنش پذیری عاطفی، واکنش پذیری فیزیولوژیکی، استرس اجتماعی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Stress، Social inhibition، Emotional reactivity، Physiological reactivity، Social stress
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107811
کد محصول  E14091
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Declarations of interest
Funding
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References

 

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Abstract

Background: There are large individual differences in dealing with everyday social stress. Therefore, we investigated the association of social inhibition (and its facets) with the emotional and physiological responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Methods: Undergraduate students (N = 312) completed the 15-item Social Inhibition Questionnaire (SIQ15) and participated in the TSST, while emotional and cardiovascular stress responses were recorded. We examined the effect of social inhibition across time with repeated-measures ANCOVAs. Findings: During social stress (and recovery), social inhibition was associated with increased negative mood reactivity (especially the behavioral inhibition facet) and heightened sympathetic activation (especially the social withdrawal and interpersonal sensitivity). Physiological stress reactivity seems to be mostly α-adrenergic in women, and also β-adrenergic in men. Conclusions: Emotional and physiological stress responses are associated with individual differences in social inhibition. This warrants more research on mechanisms that underlie the relations between social inhibition, stress and health.

Introduction

Research to date holds evidence of individual differences in vulnerability to social stress (e.g., Bibbey, Carroll, Ginty, & Phillips, 2015; Kret, Denollet, Grezes, & de Gelder, 2011). A maladaptive response to social threat is characterized by cardiovascular arousal (e.g., increased heart rate and total peripheral resistance (Bosch et al., 2009)) and increased negative emotional arousal (e.g., Childs, White, & de Wit, 2014; Habra, Linden, Anderson, & Weinberg, 2003). Recurrent social stress, but also elevated loneliness and social isolation, have emerged as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and premature mortality (Cundiff & Smith, 2017; Rosengren et al., 2004; Steptoe, Shankar, Demakakos, & Wardle, 2013). Individual differences in dealing with everyday social stress may be associated with social inhibition, which can be defined as “a broad and stable personality trait characterized by behavioral inhibition during social interaction, increased social-evaluative concerns, and withdrawal from intense social engagement situations” (Denollet & Duijndam, 2019). Socially inhibited adults may be more susceptible to increased levels of social stress because they are more upset at having to interact with people, and are more concerned with others’ evaluations of themselves (Denollet & Duijndam, 2019; Denollet, 2013; Marin & Miller, 2013). Previous findings indicate that during social interactions, socially inhibited individuals experience high arousal negative emotions such as anxiety and anger (Lin et al., 2017; Timmermans et al., 2019). However, less is known about low arousal negative emotions, such as sadness or fatigue, and how emotional reactivity is related to social inhibition during social stress.

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

دکمه بازگشت به بالا