مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | پاسخهای فیزیولوژیکی و عاطفی به استرس ارزیابی در بزرگسالان جوان با مهار اجتماعی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Physiological and emotional responses to evaluative stress in socially inhibited young adults |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2020 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 10 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.828 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 107 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.481 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0301-0511 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q2 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | روانشناسی |
گرایش های مرتبط | روانشناسی عمومی، روانشناسی بالینی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | روانشناسی زیست شناختی – Biological Psychology |
دانشگاه | CoRPS – Centre of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders, Tilburg University, The Netherlands |
کلمات کلیدی | استرس، مهار اجتماعی، واکنش پذیری عاطفی، واکنش پذیری فیزیولوژیکی، استرس اجتماعی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Stress، Social inhibition، Emotional reactivity، Physiological reactivity، Social stress |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107811 |
کد محصول | E14091 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion Declarations of interest Funding Appendix A. Supplementary data References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Background: There are large individual differences in dealing with everyday social stress. Therefore, we investigated the association of social inhibition (and its facets) with the emotional and physiological responses to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST). Methods: Undergraduate students (N = 312) completed the 15-item Social Inhibition Questionnaire (SIQ15) and participated in the TSST, while emotional and cardiovascular stress responses were recorded. We examined the effect of social inhibition across time with repeated-measures ANCOVAs. Findings: During social stress (and recovery), social inhibition was associated with increased negative mood reactivity (especially the behavioral inhibition facet) and heightened sympathetic activation (especially the social withdrawal and interpersonal sensitivity). Physiological stress reactivity seems to be mostly α-adrenergic in women, and also β-adrenergic in men. Conclusions: Emotional and physiological stress responses are associated with individual differences in social inhibition. This warrants more research on mechanisms that underlie the relations between social inhibition, stress and health. Introduction Research to date holds evidence of individual differences in vulnerability to social stress (e.g., Bibbey, Carroll, Ginty, & Phillips, 2015; Kret, Denollet, Grezes, & de Gelder, 2011). A maladaptive response to social threat is characterized by cardiovascular arousal (e.g., increased heart rate and total peripheral resistance (Bosch et al., 2009)) and increased negative emotional arousal (e.g., Childs, White, & de Wit, 2014; Habra, Linden, Anderson, & Weinberg, 2003). Recurrent social stress, but also elevated loneliness and social isolation, have emerged as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and premature mortality (Cundiff & Smith, 2017; Rosengren et al., 2004; Steptoe, Shankar, Demakakos, & Wardle, 2013). Individual differences in dealing with everyday social stress may be associated with social inhibition, which can be defined as “a broad and stable personality trait characterized by behavioral inhibition during social interaction, increased social-evaluative concerns, and withdrawal from intense social engagement situations” (Denollet & Duijndam, 2019). Socially inhibited adults may be more susceptible to increased levels of social stress because they are more upset at having to interact with people, and are more concerned with others’ evaluations of themselves (Denollet & Duijndam, 2019; Denollet, 2013; Marin & Miller, 2013). Previous findings indicate that during social interactions, socially inhibited individuals experience high arousal negative emotions such as anxiety and anger (Lin et al., 2017; Timmermans et al., 2019). However, less is known about low arousal negative emotions, such as sadness or fatigue, and how emotional reactivity is related to social inhibition during social stress. |