| مشخصات مقاله | |
| ترجمه عنوان مقاله | آیا جرایم سایبری روی میز است؟ بررسی ارتکاب جرم cafeteria-style در میان مجرمان سایبری انگیزه یافته با پول |
| عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Cybercrime on the menu? Examining cafeteria-style offending among financially motivated cybercriminals |
| انتشار | مقاله سال 2022 |
| تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 9 صفحه |
| هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
| پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
| نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
| مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
| نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
| نوع مقاله | ISI |
| فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
| ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
6.829 در سال 2020 |
| شاخص H_index | 178 در سال 2020 |
| شاخص SJR | 2.108 در سال 2020 |
| شناسه ISSN | 0747-5632 |
| شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2020 |
| فرضیه | ندارد |
| مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
| پرسشنامه | ندارد |
| متغیر | ندارد |
| رفرنس | دارد |
| رشته های مرتبط | حقوق، مهندسی کامپیوتر |
| گرایش های مرتبط | حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، امنیت اطلاعات |
| نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
| مجله | کامپیوترها در رفتار انسان – Computers in Human Behavior |
| دانشگاه | Michigan State University, USA |
| کلمات کلیدی | جرایم سایبری، فیشینگ، بدافزار، جرم سازمان یافته، شبکه مجرمانه، ارتکاب جرم cafeteria-style |
| کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Cybercrime, Phishing, Malware, Organized crime, Criminal network, Cafeteria-style offending |
| شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106979 |
| کد محصول | E15807 |
| وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
| دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
| سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
| فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
| Abstract Keywords Introduction Cybercrime offending versatility and specialization Data and methods Findings Discussion and conclusions Credit statement References |
| بخشی از متن مقاله: |
| ABSTRACT Criminologists have frequently debated whether offenders are specialists, in that they consistently perform either one offense or similar offenses, or versatile by performing any crime based on opportunities and situational provocations. Such foundational research has yet to be developed regarding cybercrimes, or offenses enabled by computer technology and the Internet. This study address this issue using a sample of 37 offender networks. The results show variations in the offending behaviors of those involved in cybercrime. Almost half of the offender networks in this sample appeared to be cybercrime specialists, in that they only performed certain forms of cybercrime. The other half performed various types of crimes on and offline. The relative equity in specialization relative to versatility, particularly in both on and offline activities, suggests that there may be limited value in treating cybercriminals as a distinct offender group. Furthermore, this study calls to question what factors influence an offender’s pathway into cybercrime, whether as a specialized or versatile offender. The actors involved in cybercrime networks, whether as specialists or generalists, were enmeshed into broader online offender networks who may have helped recognize and act on opportunities to engage in phishing, malware, and other economic offenses. Introduction Criminologists have frequently debated whether offenders are specialists, in that they consistently perform either one offense or similar offenses, or versatile by performing any crime based on opportunities and situational provocations (Britt, 1994, pp. 173–191; DeLisi, 2003; Moffitt, 1993; Piquero, Farrington, & Blumstein, 2007; Wolfgang, Figlio, & Sellin, 1972; Youngs & Canter, 2012). The issue of offense specialization or versatility is often examined in the context of developmental theories of crime (e.g. Moffitt, Caspi, Rutter, & Silva, 2001: Laub & Sampson, 1993) as a way to assess the development and progression of a criminal career. Contradictory evidence is presented by researchers who support the general theory of crime (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) or rational choice frameworks (Cornish and Clarke, 2014; Guerette, Stenius, & McGloin, 2005), who argue the absence of specialization is a result of individuals acting on opportunities when available. |