مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد بررسی چندگروهی از ادراکات کارکنان موقت – الزویر ۲۰۱۹
مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | سهامداران و فروشندگان: یک بررسی چندگروهی از ادراکات کارکنان موقتی (اقتصاد گیگ) |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Sharers and sellers: A multi-group examination of gig economy workers’ perceptions |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۹ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۱ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۵٫۳۵۲ در سال ۲۰۱۸ |
شاخص H_index | ۱۵۸ در سال ۲۰۱۹ |
شاخص SJR | ۱٫۶۸۴ در سال ۲۰۱۸ |
شناسه ISSN | ۰۱۴۸-۲۹۶۳ |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال ۲۰۱۸ |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | دارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط | بازاریابی، اقتصاد مالی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله تحقیقات کسب و کار-Journal of Business Research |
دانشگاه | College of Business and Innovation, The University of Toledo, Mail Stop #103, Toledo, OH 43606, United States of America |
کلمات کلیدی | اقتصاد گیگ، اقتصاد اشتراکی، فروش مستقیم، مدل معادلات ساختاری |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Gig economy، Sharing economy، Direct selling، Structural equation model |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.041 |
کد محصول | E12182 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract ۱٫ Introduction ۲٫ Theoretical background and hypothesis development ۳٫ Research methodology ۴٫ Discussion ۵٫ Limitations and future research Acknowledgements Appendix A References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
The increased usage and proliferation of businesses entering the gig economy has meant more employment options for individuals wishing to participate in the gig economy. However, not all gig employment opportunities are the same. Typically, gig employment opportunities fall into one of two categories: the sharing economy or direct selling. These two types of gig employment are unique in the perceptions of those that choose to engage in them. This research seeks to provide insights into the drivers of gig worker perceptions of the product, organizational trust, job outcome status and satisfaction. Results suggest that direct sales workers have higher levels of self-congruence, and lower levels of perceived commerciality, leading to positive evaluations of the product offered, organizational trust and job satisfaction. Conversely, sharing economy workers have much lower levels of self-congruence, and higher levels of perceived commerciality, leading to a more complicated relationship with the outcome variables. Introduction The growth of businesses entering the gig economy has meant more employment options for individuals seeking freedom and flexibility amidst wage stagnation and increased income volatility. In 2017, over 57 million adults, or 36% of the eligible workforce, participated in the gig economy (Hayzlett, 2018). According to Fabio Rosati, the CEO of Upwork, gig work contributes more than $700 billion to the national economy (Horowitz & Rosati, 2014). This work is appealing for a variety of reasons. For example, gig work provides younger people the ability to earn money while still going to school or participating in other activities not conducive to traditional employment. For workers who are underemployed or suffering from wage stagnation, the gig economy offers the opportunity to supplement income. For those nearing retirement age, gig work offers a way to delay collecting social security. In fact, the AARP and Uber have a partnership that encourages senior citizens to drive for the ride sharing company (aarp.com). The recent proliferation and rising importance of the gig economy as a formidable economic force is, in part, evidenced by the concept being recently recognized by both the Financial Times and NPR as a word of the year (Hook, 2015; Nunberg, 2016). |