مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | تحویل یکپارچه پروژه با BIM: یک رویکرد خودکار مبتنی بر EVM |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Integrated project delivery with BIM: An automated EVM-based approach |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 16 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.810 در سال 2019 |
شاخص H_index | 95 در سال 2020 |
شاخص SJR | 1.408 در سال 2019 |
شناسه ISSN | 0926-5805 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2019 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی عمران، مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت ساخت، مدیریت پروژه |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | اتوماسیون در ساخت و ساز – Automation in Construction |
دانشگاه | University of Portsmouth, School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, Portsmouth PO1 2UP, UK |
کلمات کلیدی | مدلسازی اطلاعات ساختمان، تحویل یکپارچه پروژه – مدلسازی اطلاعات ساختمان، 5 بعدی، هزینه تحویل یکپارچه پروژه، تدارکات ساخت و ساز |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Building Information Modelling، BIM-IPD، 5D، IPD cost، Construction procurement |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102907 |
کد محصول | E14595 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract Graphical abstract 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical background 3. Research gap 4. Methods 5. Developing the framework 6. Results and analysis 7. Significance and implications 8. Conclusion Appendix A. Activity based costing overhead estimation sheet to all project overhead activities References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
The Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in integration with Building Information Modelling/Management (BIM) is an optimal approach for delivering construction projects. This is, however fraught with complications, due to the inability of current cost management practices to determine fair risk/reward ratio in IPD arrangements. Previous research has established the advantages of Earned Value Management-based (EVM) method for risk/reward sharing, as well as, how Activity Based Costing (ABC) method can facilitate automating the sharing process. This study proposes an innovative approach to exploit the capabilities of these techniques coupled with BIM in automating/optimising the process of IPD risk/reward sharing. This includes providing mathematical equations for risk/reward sharing and developing a model that strengthens IPD parties’ relationships. The process is enhanced through developing an EVM-Web grid that enables the participants to easily track their costs on computers and mobile devices. To demonstrate the applicability and validity of the proposed model, it is applied on a real-life case and displays promising results in terms of flexibility in allocating risk/reward for varying scenarios. Introduction Traditional project delivery systems have proven inefficient in improving overall performance [48]. In response to this, Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) has been proposed and used in projects across the construction industry [85]. IPD provides a new contractual, behavioural and organisational context for delivering construction projects, through enhancing integrated and collaborative practices [62]. It is an innovative project delivery method, characterised by early, collaborative, and collective engagement of key stakeholders across all phases of delivering a project [3,4]. Evidence, however, shows that the percentage of real-life projects using IPD is small [25,61], mainly due to the negative influence of barriers that hinder widespread use of IPD [23,73,75]. Successful delivery of a project through IPD is not easy, and IPD requires fulfilling a wide range of requirements and establishing various support systems [21]. Failure in establishing these support systems creates barriers. Examples are flawed IPD compensation model, resistance to information sharing, ineffective decision-making regimes, and disagreement on liability waivers among stakeholders [32,72]. Of these, the IPD compensation model, also called risk/reward compensation, is of cardinal importance [46]. It is described as a key principle of IPD [83], that plays a pivotal role in stimulating creativity, motivating collaboration, and sustaining performance [42,85]. Lack of a proper IPD compensation model is seen as a formidable barrier to the use of IPD on construction projects [84]. |