مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد اثربخشی توانبخشی سکته مغزی – الزویر ۲۰۲۰

مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد اثربخشی توانبخشی سکته مغزی – الزویر ۲۰۲۰

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله اثربخشی توانبخشی سکته مغزی در مقایسه با پروتکل توانبخشی شدید و غیر شدید: یک مطالعه چند محوری
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Effectiveness of Stroke Rehabilitation Compared between Intensive and Nonintensive Rehabilitation Protocol: A Multicenter Study
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۲۰
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۶ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۱٫۷۰۲ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شاخص H_index ۵۰ در سال ۲۰۲۰
شاخص SJR ۰٫۷۷۵ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شناسه ISSN ۱۰۵۲-۳۰۵۷
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q2 در سال ۲۰۱۹
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر دارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط پزشکی
گرایش های مرتبط پزشکی فیزیکی و توانبخشی، مغز و اعصاب
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله  مجله سکته مغزی و بیماریهای مغزی عروقی – Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
دانشگاه  Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
کلمات کلیدی سکته مغزی، توانبخشی، اثربخشی، بهره وری
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Stroke، Rehabilitation، Effectiveness، Efficiency
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104809
کد محصول E14969
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Summary and Conclusion
Conflict of Interest
Acknowledgments
Reference

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Abstract

Background and aim: Stroke is one of the leading causes of death, physical disability, and economic burden. Nowadays, various types of rehabilitation are available. Rehabilitation centers in Thailand provide services in different ways, including starting time, duration, and frequency of each therapy. In addition, many rehabilitation wards have a standing policy to reduce length of stay (LOS) due to economic considerations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and efficiency between intensive and nonintensive rehabilitation protocol for stroke patients. Methods: This prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted among stroke patients who admitted to rehabilitation wards at 14 centers. All participants received either intensive or non-intensive rehabilitation program. Barthel Index (BI) at admission (BIad), BI at discharge (BIdc), and LOS were recorded. The effectiveness was difference in BIdc and BIad score (DBI), and the efficiency was DBI divided by LOS (DBI/LOS). Results: Seven hundred and eighty stroke patients were included. Mean age was 61.9 § ۱۳٫۳ years, and 59.7% were male. The majority of patients (79.5%) were admitted for intensive rehabilitation. Effectiveness and efficiency were significantly higher in the intensive group than in the nonintensive group (4.5 § ۳٫۴ versus 2.6 § ۳٫۲ and .24 § .۳۰ versus .18 § .۳۳, respectively). LOS, intensive rehabilitation, and quality of life were significantly positively correlated with effectiveness; whereas, age, onset to admission interval (OAI), and BIad were significantly negatively correlated with the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation. Conclusions: Stroke patients admitted for intensive rehabilitation had better effectiveness and efficiency than those admitted for non-intensive rehabilitation. Younger patients with shorter OAI, lower BIad, and longer LOS realized significantly enhanced effectiveness.

Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of death, physical disability, and economic burden.1,2 Most stroke survivors have enduring motor disability, which often results in activity limitation and participation restriction.3 Approximately 40% of stroke patients were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation services.4 Well-organized postacute care with interdisciplinary rehabilitation would help to improve the ability of stroke survivors.5,6 Rehabilitation programs are designed on a patient-to-patient basis according to each patient’s level of disability and learning ability. Although there are fundamental principles of rehabilitation for each type of disability, rehabilitation protocols can vary from center to center. Stroke recovery outcome depends on many factors, including age, severity of stroke, comorbidity, cognitive function, duration of disease, and family support.7,8 Rehabilitation service, which provides an effective rehabilitation program using organized and accepted practice guidelines, is one of the factors that contributes to good functional recovery in stroke survivors.2 There are currently many types of rehabilitation service available, including very early rehabilitation, early intensive rehabilitation, extended rehabilitation service, and home-based rehabilitation. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation after stroke. Previous studies reported that early mobilization of acute stroke patients reduces complications related to immobility and decreases hospital length of stay.9,10 Biernaskie, et al reported that early rehabilitation after stroke enhances brain recovery, but that this effect declines over time.

برچسب ها

ثبت دیدگاه