مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | شفافیت درباره نتایج حسابرسی داخلی به منظور کاهش هزینه های ثابت نظارت: یک مطالعه کیفی درباره پیش شرط نتایج حسابرسی تسهیم |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Transparency about internal audit results to reduce the supervisory burden: A qualitative study on the preconditions of sharing audit results |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2020 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 8 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR – MedLine |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.264 در سال 2019 |
شاخص H_index | 79 در سال 2020 |
شاخص SJR | 1.275 در سال 2019 |
شناسه ISSN | 0168-8510 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2019 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | حسابداری |
گرایش های مرتبط | حسابرسی، حسابداری مالی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | خط مشی سلامتی – Health Policy |
دانشگاه | Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands |
کلمات کلیدی | کنترل کیفیت، تقویت کیفیت، حاکمیت، بهداشت و درمان، حسابرسی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Quality control, Quality improvement, Governance, Healthcare, Audit |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.11.013 |
کد محصول | E14214 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1. Introduction 2. Methods 3. Results 4. Discussion 5. Conclusion Acknowledgements Appendix A. Supplementary data References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Many working hours of healthcare professionals are spent on administrative tasks.Administrative burden is caused by political choices, legislation, the requirements of health insurers and supervisors. Coordination between the parties involved, is lacking. Therefore, we studied to what extent sharing internal audit results of hospitals with external supervisors is possible and the necessary preconditions.We interviewed 42 individuals from six hospitals and the Dutch Health and Youth Care Inspectorate The interviewees expressed thatthere is no coordination in timing and content between internal audits and external supervision. They were in favour of sharing internal audit results with external supervisors to reduce the supervisory burden. They stated that internal audits give insight into quality problems and improvements, how hospital directors govern quality and safety, and the culture of improvement within healthcare provider teams. With this information, the inspectorate can judge to what extent hospitals are learning organisations. The interviewees mentioned the following preconditions for sharing audit results: reliable and risk-based information about quality and safety, collected by expert, trained auditors, and careful use of this information by the inspectorate in order to maintain openness among audited healthcare professionals. In conclusion, internal audit results can be shared conditionally with external supervisors. When internal audit results show that hospitals are open, learning and self-reflecting organisations, the healthcare inspectorate can reduce their supervisory burden. Introduction Healthcare professionals spend 40 % of their working hours on administrative tasks, including registering and supplying quality [1–3]. The administrative burden is caused by political choices, legislation, the requirements of health insurers, and internal and external supervisors (Table 1) [4–6]. There is a lack of coordination between the parties involved: 69 % of medical specialists and 75 % of residents indicate that they have to perform certain registration actions twice for different parties [3]. In the Netherlands, administrative costs are 20 % higher than those in other European countries [7]. Boards of directors are also increasingly confronted with new and altered quality requirements; these are primarily intended for quality improvement by healthcare professionals, but are increasingly used for supervision and enforcement [8]. Every hospital is monitored by 19 inspection services, including nine government inspectorates [9]. |