مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | عدم اطمینان، حس گرایی استراتژیک و شکست سازمانی در بازار هنر: چه مشکلی در سرمایهگذاری شرکت LVMH در حراجی های فیلیپس رخ داد؟ |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Uncertainty, strategic sensemaking and organisational failure in the art market: What went wrong with LVMH’s investment in Phillips auctioneers? |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 14 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.352 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 158 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 1.684 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0148-2963 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت کسب و کار، اقتصاد مالی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله تحقیقات کسب و کار- Journal of Business Research |
دانشگاه | Brunel Business School, Brunel University London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
کلمات کلیدی | حس گرایی استراتژیک، شکست سازمانی، بازار هنر، خانه های حراجی، عدم قطعیت |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Strategic sensemaking، Organisational failure، Art market، Auction houses، Uncertainty |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.030 |
کد محصول | E12170 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Uncertainty, strategic sensemaking and failure in the art market 3. Research method 4. The case of Phillips (1999–2002) in the auction industry 5. An analysis of strategic sensemaking and failure at Phillips 6. Conclusion Acknowledgement References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Strategic decision-making in the volatile and uncertain art market is not only instigated by rational interpretation of the external environment, but also by expert-based intuition. This paper investigates organisational failure at Phillips auctioneers between 1999 and 2002, a period in which it was owned by the multinational luxury goods conglomerate Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy (LVMH). To analyse this case, we develop a conceptual framework for strategic sensemaking in art organisations that includes the processes of scanning, interpreting, strategising, acting and adjusting, which take place in non-linear and recursive patterns in supporting continuous loops of improvement. Our analysis identifies the merits of intuitive decision-making when realising a novel artistic and entrepreneurial vision which established Phillips as a boutique auction house. However, it also highlights the limitations of emotional and opportunistic decision-making which could lead to blinded management if any of the processes of strategic sensemaking is ignored. Introduction Although ‘trial-and-error’ is a widely accepted learning mechanism for organisations, the literature of strategic management often dismisses the useful lessons which can be learned from the analysis of failure. This research focuses on organisational failure, which refers to the discontinuance of a business or ownership of it, or to temporary performance problems which do not necessarily require the end of the firm (Amankwah-Amoah, 2016; Mellahi & Wilkinson, 2004). Existing research is clustered around the deterministic perspective which identifies sources of organisational failure in the external environment of firms, such as regulations, technological change, competition and unforeseen events (Amankwah-Amoah & Zhang, 2015; Hager, Galaskiewicz, & Larson, 1996); and the voluntaristic perspective which addresses failure as a result of agency, and in particular, as an outcome of poor leadership and decision-making, as well as maladministration, fraud and corruption (Amankwah-Amoah & Debrah, 2010). However, both perspectives are inadequate when treated separately. By placing too much emphasis on external factors, deterministic perspectives often dismiss the strategic choices of agents (Child, 1972); while voluntaristic perspectives cannot fully explain the strategic fit of firms that operate within uncertain environments that rely on creativity and innovation (Bilton, 2007; Caves, 2000). |