مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | بین طرفداری، اطاعت و تعهد: تجزیه و تحلیل چند سطحی منطق نهادی در مدیریت محیط کار |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 14 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
1.900 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 50 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 0.883 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0956-5221 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت منابع انسانی، مدیریت اجرایی، مدیریت پروژه، مدیریت عملکرد |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مجله اسکاندیناوی مدیریت – Scandinavian Journal of Management |
دانشگاه | Department of Materials and Production, Aalborg University, AC Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen SV, Denmark |
کلمات کلیدی | منطق نهادي، مدیریت ایمنی و بهداشت شغلی، رئالیسم انتقادی |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Institutional logics، OSH، Critical realism |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.11.002 |
کد محصول | E11486 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Theoretical framework 3- Methodology 4- Three logics of work environment management 5- Concluding discussion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract In this study we explore the development and enactment of institutional logics in the field of work environment management. We show how three historically developed logics constitute different values and practices that guide professionals’ organizational action. Using both historical and contemporary qualitative data, we show how the three institutional logics are present in the field of work environment, and how the logics are enacted simultaneously by actors within four large organizations in Denmark. The study contributes to the literature on institutional logics. The logics perspective is combined with critical realism to describe the inter-relatedness between the levels of society, institutional fields, and organizations, and by elaborating the near-decomposable relations between institutional logics and orders. The study contributes to the literature on work environment management by investigating the ideational lenses through which regulations and interventions are perceived by organizational actors, and how these perceptions may lead to different organizational outcomes and outlooks in work environment management. Introduction Work environment management has evolved considerably during the last 40 years. From being a matter of preventing chemical risks and workplace accidents in the early 1970s, this management area is now also concerned with creating sustainable performance cultures and dealing with a wide array of psychosocial issues. The approach has developed from a model where the organization simply complies with an extensive list of external formal requirements, to a model that integrates work environment tasks into the organization’s fundamental practices and strategies. Correspondingly, work environment professionals have moved from positions outside the companies in the regulatory wider participatory labor market structures, to positions inside the companies in professionalized staff functions, where they have gradually replaced the voluntary employee and management representatives (Seim, Limborg, & Jensen, 2015). However, work environment management is not only an organizational technical task, but also part of a wider industrial relations system whereby it is subject to political and ideological conflicts and compromises evolving over time. Thus, the field of work environment management constitutes a richly textured empirical case, which is suitable for investigating and illustrating how institutional and organizational dynamics simultaneously play out at multiple levels, including the deeply institutionalized and stabilizing level of society, the level of the work environment field, and the more adaptive practice development at the organizational level. To explain how the management of work environment changes on these different levels we incorporate an analytical framework inspired by critical realism in general and Margaret Archer in particular (1995; 1998) into theories of institutional logics. |