مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | رهبری مشترک در تیم های پروژه: یک مدل مفهومی چند سطحی یکپارچه و برنامه تحقیقاتی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Shared leadership in project teams: An integrative multi-level conceptual model and research agenda |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2019 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 17 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
5.979 در سال 2018 |
شاخص H_index | 121 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 2.203 در سال 2018 |
شناسه ISSN | 0263-7863 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2018 |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت پروژه |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله بین المللی مدیریت پروژه-International Journal of Project Management |
دانشگاه | Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, 12613, Giza, Egypt |
کلمات کلیدی | رهبری، رهبری مشترک، تیم های پروژه، پیامدهای پروژه، مرور مقالات سیستماتیک |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Leadership; Shared leadership; Project teams; Project outcomes; Systematic literature review |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.02.002 |
کد محصول | E12202 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Research needs and study objectives 3. Methodology 4. Conceptualisation of shared leadership in the extant literature 5. Development of an integrative definition of shared leadership in project teams 6. Development of a multi-level conceptual model of shared leadership in project teams 7. Boundary conditions of the new model 8. Recommendations for a future research agenda 9. Study limitations and conclusions Conflict of interest References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract
Shared leadership has rarely been studied in the project management context, despite its proven performance-enhancing benefits in other management domains. Based on a systematic review of the salient literature from multiple disciplines, this paper develops a new multi-level conceptual model to advance a holistic understanding of how shared leadership develops and how it may impact individual, team, project and wider organisational performance. The conceptual model draws upon the input-mediator-output-input perspective of systems theory, which is wellestablished in the general team literature. The new integrative model identifies the potential multi-level antecedents, proximal team functioning outcomes, and the more distal multi-level outcomes of shared leadership based on findings from the shared leadership literature drawn largely from other domains. Potential boundary conditions of the model are identified. A future research agenda is recommended for empirically testing the new multi-level shared leadership model and its different elements in a diverse range of project contexts. Introduction Today’s workplace is becoming increasingly project-centric (Schoper et al., 2018) with projects growing more complex (Bjorvatn and Wald, 2018) and requiring the use of many different team types, including multidisciplinary teams (ScottYoung and Samson, 2008), multiple teams (Gemünden et al., 2018), and sometimes inter-firm teams (Von Danwitz, 2018) to efficiently deliver project objectives. Often these project teams are co-located, but some teams work virtually and are dispersed across time and geographical zones, presenting additional challenges for coordination (Muethel and Hoegl, 2016). It is rare that any single individual will possess all the knowledge and skills necessary to direct or carry the entire project team’s performance (Pearce and Manz, 2005). Effective integrated project teams collaborate to make full use of members’ diverse expertise and contributions (Scott-Young and Samson, 2008), and are able to draw upon the leadership of more than one person to manage and coordinate different tasks (Muethel and Hoegl, 2016). |