مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد تلاش حسابرسی و کیفیت حسابرسی – الزویر 2020

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله چگونه تلاش حسابرسی بر کیفیت حسابرسی تأثیر می گذارد: فرایند حسابرسی و چشم انداز خروجی حسابرسی
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله How audit effort affects audit quality: An audit process and audit output perspective
انتشار مقاله سال 2020
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی 19 صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) Scopus – Master Journals List
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
1.657 در سال 2019
شاخص H_index 9 در سال 2020
شاخص SJR 0.358 در سال 2019
شناسه ISSN 1755-3091
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q3 در سال 2019
مدل مفهومی ندارد
پرسشنامه ندارد
متغیر دارد
رفرنس دارد
رشته های مرتبط حسابداری
گرایش های مرتبط حسابرسی
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله  مجله تحقیقات حسابداری چین – China Journal of Accounting Research
دانشگاه  School of Accountancy, Central University of Finance and Economics, China
کلمات کلیدی تلاش حسابرسی، تنظیم حسابرسی، نظر حسابرسی، کیفیت حسابرسی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Audit effort، Audit adjustment، Audit opinion، Audit quality
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.02.002
کد محصول E14976
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature review and hypothesis development
3. Data and methodology
4. Main results
5. Additional analyses
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References

بخشی از متن مقاله:
Abstract

Using a unique dataset of audit days in China from 2006 to 2011, this paper examines the relationship between audit effort and audit quality from the perspective of audit process and audit output. The results show that audit effort significantly increases the probability of audit adjustments, which inhibits positive earnings management and improves the quality of audited financial statements. We also find that audit effort does not have a significant effect on the issuance of modified audit opinions overall, but that a modified audit opinion is more likely to be issued in the absence of an audit adjustment. Furthermore, we find that the impact of audit effort on audit quality is attenuated when clients are more complex and when audit firms are larger. Collectively, our evidence suggests that audit effort plays an important role in improving audit quality by influencing audit process and audit output. Our study extends the literature on the impact of audit effort on audit quality in emerging markets, and the conclusions have important implications for the improvement of China’s audit market efficiency.

Introduction

Audit plays an important role as an external corporate governance mechanism, and the governance effect of audit is directly reflected in audit quality. The overall objectives of audit are to obtain reasonable assurance that there is no material misstatement caused by fraud or error in financial statements, and to issue audit reports in accordance with auditing standards and communicate with client management (MOF, 2019). To realize these objectives, in the modern risk-oriented audit model, the main line of audit work requires auditors to identify, evaluate and respond to the risk of material misstatement. Consistent with the audit objective, audit quality is defined as the joint probability that an existing material misstatement is detected and reported by an auditor (DeAngelo, 1981). The realization process of audit quality can be summarized as detecting, adjusting, and reporting material misstatements, and achieving audit quality. How to realize audit objectives and improve audit quality has always been the focus of audit research. Prior studies primarily investigate factors influencing audit quality from the perspective of auditor independence, including client importance, audit firm tenure, auditor mandatory rotation, and fees from audit and non-audit services (Reynolds and Francis, 2000; Frankel et al., 2002; Kinney et al., 2004; Carey and Simnett, 2006; Chen and Xia, 2006; Lennox et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2017).

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

دکمه بازگشت به بالا