مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد رفاه در پاندمی کووید ۱۹ و نقش مراقبتی خودکارآمدی شغلی – الزویر ۲۰۲۲
مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | نقش محافظتی خودکارآمدی کاری بر سلامتی در طول همهگیری کووید ۱۹: نتایج یک مطالعه طولی یک ساله |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | The protective role of work self-efficacy on wellbeing during COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a longitudinal year-long study |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۲۲ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۷ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journal List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۳٫۹۵۲ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
شاخص H_index | ۱۸۱ در سال ۲۰۲۲ |
شاخص SJR | ۱٫۱۷۸ در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
شناسه ISSN | ۰۱۹۱-۸۸۶۹ |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال ۲۰۲۰ |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | دارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | ندارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | روانشناسی – مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | روانشناسی عمومی – روانشناسی صنعتی و سازمانی – مدیریت منابع انسانی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | شخصیت و تفاوت های فردی – Personality and Individual Differences |
دانشگاه | Norwich Business School, University of East Anglia, UK |
کلمات کلیدی | رفاه – خودکارآمدی – خودکارآمدی کاری – کووید-۱۹ – رویکرد شخص محور |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Wellbeing – Self-efficacy – Work self-efficacy – COVID-19 – Person-centered approach |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111760 |
کد محصول | e16733 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract ۱٫ Introduction ۲٫ Methods ۳٫ Results ۴٫ Discussion Acknowledgment References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract In this study, we focused on four work self-efficacy dimensions and their relationship with wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. We adopted a person-centered approach and investigated whether individuals with different work self-efficacy profiles would have different wellbeing experiences at 6 and 12 months from the beginning of the pandemic. Data were collected in the UK across three waves (January 2020, October 2020 and January 2021) on a sample of 393 full-time employees. Results showed that being in two at-risk profiles significantly increases the likelihood of experiencing lower wellbeing during the pandemic. In particular, the probability of belonging to the Profile 3 “low self-efficacy but high empathic” significantly increased the risk of lower wellbeing in the shorter and longer timeframe. In addition, the probability of belonging to the Profile 2 “high assertive and task self-efficacy but low emotional” also significantly increased the risk of lower wellbeing in the longer timeframe. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic constitutes a major threat to physical and mental health (Huremović, ۲۰۱۹). Although it can be seen as an “acute extra-organizational stressor” (Kuntz, 2021, p. 188), it has prompted major changes in the workplace and increased experiences of anxiety and depression (Restubog et al., 2020). The lack of individuals’ choice in adopting these work practices means that individuals’ resources have been crucial for thriving in the “new normal”. We argue about the importance of individual sense of control and in particular of work self-efficacy (SE) in different areas of functioning (i.e. task, emotional and social). SE is an important personal resource (Heuven et al., 2006) which could make a difference to the impact of COVID-19 on psychological wellbeing (Zhou et al., 2021): “A resilient sense of efficacy is needed to overrule emotional and psychosocial subverters of self-regulative efforts” (Bandura et al., 2003, p. 770). SE refers to the individual’s beliefs about their “capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments” (Bandura, 1997, p. 3). It enables individuals to perform and learn at a designated level, but it also allows them to cope with challenges and stressors including natural disaster and traumatic events (Schönfeld et al., 2016). In a yearlong study, we adopted a person-centered approach (Magnusson & Torestad, 1993; Morin et al., 2018) to investigate whether individuals with different work SE profiles would have different wellbeing experiences at 6 and 12 months from the beginning of the pandemic. Results Preliminary analysis Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics and correlations of the study variables. SE dimensions were significantly correlated with each other and with the positive indicator of wellbeing at all waves. Emotional SE was also correlated with the negative indicator of wellbeing measured; task and assertive SE were correlated with T2 and T1 negative wellbeing; empathic SE was not correlated with negative wellbeing. Only emotional SE was correlated with depressive feelings at T3. |