مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | باورهایی درباره از دست دادن کنترل و شناخت های دیگر مرتبط با اختلال وسواس فکری – جبری: یک بررسی آزمایشی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Beliefs about losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: An experimental investigation |
نشریه | الزویر |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2024 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 8 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – MedLine – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
2.341 در سال 2022 |
شاخص H_index | 86 در سال 2023 |
شاخص SJR | 0.809 در سال 2022 |
شناسه ISSN | 1873-7943 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2022 |
فرضیه | ندارد |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | روانشناسی – پزشکی |
گرایش های مرتبط | روانشناسی بالینی – روانشناسی شناخت – روانپزشکی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry – مجله رفتار درمانی و روانپزشکی آزمایشی |
دانشگاه | Concordia University, Canada |
کلمات کلیدی | وسواس فکری – جبری، باورها، آزمایش، از دست دادن کنترل |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | OCD, Beliefs, Experiment, Losing control |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101919 |
لینک سایت مرجع | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0005791623000861 |
کد محصول | e17628 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Method 3 Results 4 Discussion Funding sources CRediT authorship contribution statement References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Background and objectives Methods Results Limitations Conclusions
Introduction Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) is a debilitating disorder with an estimated prevalence of approximately 2% (Ruscio et al., 2010). OCD is comprised of obsessions and/or compulsions that are time-consuming, and that cause significant distress and/or impairment for affected individuals (APA, 2013). Obsessions are unwanted repetitive intrusive thoughts, images, or impulses that cause discomfort or distress (APA, 2013; Rachman, 1997). Compulsions are repetitive overt or covert behaviour, performed to alleviate the distress associated with intrusive thoughts, and/or to prevent negative events from occurring (APA, 2013; Rachman & Hodgson, 1980). OCD is often chronic and associated with a variety of unfavourable outcomes including social difficulties, and occupational impairment (Abramowitz & Jacoby, 2015; Eisen et al., 2006, 2010).
Cognitive theories (Rachman, 1997, 1998; Salkovskis, 1985) suggest that OCD develops due to misinterpretations of common intrusive thoughts as overly significant which leads individuals to engage in compulsive behaviours in an attempt to prevent negative outcomes. The likelihood that intrusive thoughts are misinterpreted as personally significant is proposed to be increased by specific dysfunctional beliefs (e.g., Frost & Steketee, 2002). Early research on the influence of maladaptive beliefs in OCD focused largely on beliefs pertaining to inflated responsibility, with findings indicating that greater perceived responsibility was associated with greater obsessive compulsive symptoms (e.g., Ladouceur et al., 1995; Ladouceur et al., 1996; Leonhart & Radomsky, 2019; Lopatka & Rachman, 1995; Salkovskis, 1985). The Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group (OCCWG) later identified six beliefs which clustered into three domains: 1) responsibility and threat overestimation, 2) perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty, and 3) importance of and control over thoughts (ICT), proposed to be relevant to OCD (OCCWG, 1997, 2001, 2003, 2005; Frost & Steketee, 2002). However, not all individuals with OCD endorse high levels of these dysfunctional beliefs suggesting that additional cognitive mechanisms may be involved in the development and maintenance of this disorder (Taylor et al., 2006).
Results 3.1. Data screening Neither univariate nor multivariate analysis indicated any outliers, and as such, all data were retained. Variables of interest were normally distributed (i.e., kurtosis < |10|, skewness < |3|; Kline, 2016), and other assumptions of MANOVA (i.e., homogeneity of variance and multicollinearity) were also met. Eight participants were excluded from subsequent analyses because they did not believe the feedback provided after the bogus cognitive task. There were no baseline differences on demographic characteristics or on the questionnaires of interest (see Table 2). The mean scores on the questionnaires were comparable to previous studies which have used undergraduate samples (e.g., Kia-Keating et al., 2018; Kelly-Turner & Radomsky, 2020; OCCWG, 2005; Osman et al., 2012; Thordarson et al., 2004). |