مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | رشد اقتصادی و بازگشت سرمایه گذاری عمومی و خصوصی در ۱۷ اقتصاد OECD |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Economic growth, public, and private investment returns in 17 OECD economies |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۸ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۱۹ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه اسپرینگر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۰٫۴۰۰ (۲۰۱۷) |
شاخص H_index | ۱۱ (۲۰۱۸) |
شاخص SJR | ۰٫۲۱۳ (۲۰۱۸) |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت، اقتصاد |
گرایش های مرتبط | مدیریت مالی، اقتصاد مالی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | مجله اقتصادی پرتغال – Portuguese Economic Journal |
دانشگاه | Research Unit on Complexity and Economics – Universidade de Lisboa – Portugal |
کلمات کلیدی | سیاست مالی، سرمایه گذاری دولتی، سرمایه گذاری خصوصی، جمع شدن، نرخ بازگشت اقتصاد کلان، توابع واکنش ضربه، VAR |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Fiscal policy, Public investment, Private investment, Crowding-in, Macroeconomic rates of return, Impulse response functions, VAR |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-018-0143-7 |
کد محصول | E9365 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract ۱ Introduction ۲ Literature ۳ Analytical framework ۴ Empirical analysis ۵ Conclusion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Introduction The 2008–۲۰۰۹ economic and financial sovereign debt crisis led to a substantial drop in both GDP and investment levels and growth rates. Moreover, it led to substantial changes in economic policy, namely budgetary policy. Under budgetary duress, the level of government indebtedness is deemed to have a negative impact on public investment in EMU member countries (see, for instance, Turrini 2004, for the cases in the 1980s and in the 1990s). In fact, the abovementioned changes took in several countries the form of reduced expenditure, including public investment, and increased taxation. It is expectable that these changes may well constitute a policy regime change with structural implications on previous estimations regarding the relevance of investment for long-term growth. Additionally, such policy changes, and especially in euro area countries following adjustment programs, notably after the 2008–۲۰۰۹ economic and financial crisis, came with an emphasis on structural reforms that concern public spending levels and structure, and more generally, the way the economy and markets operate. It becomes then important to test if macroeconomic efficiency changes effectively occurred, and in what direction. For instance, Afonso and Jalles (2015) argue that the relevance of fiscal components differs for private and public investment developments. Understanding and measuring linkages between public and private investment and economic growth is of crucial importance in both developed economies and emerging markets. Public investment is a part of public expenditure (typically accounted for in the General Government) and decisions are taken within the larger framework of public finance. At the same time, it constitutes an addition to public capital. The latter, together with private and human capital, labour and other inputs, is in several approaches considered as a production factor. Public investment may therefore be linked to growth prospects. However, and as it is well documented in the literature, as part of public expenditure, it may crowd other types of investment, namely private, so that in some circumstances the net impact of public investment on GDP may be negative (see, for instance, Dreger and Reimers 2016; Cavalcanti et al. 2014; IMF 2014). At the same time, note the importance of public investment in the fiscal surveillance mechanisms of the EU, where n° ۳ of Article 126 of the Treaty of the European Union (TEU 2012) reads: |