مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | موضوعات نوظهور در کارآفرینی سازمانی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2003 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 30 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس نمیباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
7.216 در سال 2017 |
شاخص H_index | 176 در سال 2019 |
شاخص SJR | 6.462 در سال 2017 |
شناسه ISSN | 0149-2063 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2017 |
رشته های مرتبط | مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | کارآفرینی – مدیریت سازمان های دولتی |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | Journal of Management |
دانشگاه | School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, USA |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00015-1 |
کد محصول | E11828 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Outline Abstract CE, Organizational Learning, and Knowledge Entrepreneurial Leadership in Corporations: The Roles of Controls, Consensus and Trust Corporate Entrepreneurship and Internationalization Corporate Entrepreneurship and Performance: Reassessing the Dependent Variable Conclusion Acknowledgements References Vitae |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Research on corporate entrepreneurship (CE) has grown rapidly over the past decade. In this article, we identify four major issues scholars can pursue to further our understanding about CE. The issues we explore include various forms of CE (e.g., sustained regeneration, domain redefinition) and their implications for organizational learning; the role of leadership and social exchange in the CE process; and, key research opportunities relevant to CE in an international context. To address the latter issue, we propose a typology that separates content from process-related studies and new ventures vs. established companies. We close with a reassessment of the outcomes in CE research, which becomes particularly salient with the increasing importance of social, human, and intellectual capital in creating competitive advantages and wealth in today’s knowledge economy. Throughout the article, we use the organizational learning theory as a means of integrating our discussion and highlighting the potential contributions of CE to knowledge creation and effective exploitation. Both scholars and practitioners remain interested in studying and better understanding corporate entrepreneurship (CE) (Ireland, Kuratko & Covin, 2002). CE has been viewed as the driver of new businesses within on-going enterprises as achieved through internal innovation, joint ventures or acquisitions; strategic renewal (Guth & Ginsberg, 1990; Hitt, Nixon, Hoskisson & Kockhar, 1999); product, process, and administrative innovations (Covin & Miles, 1999); diversification (Burgelman, 1991); and processes through which individuals’ ideas are transformed into collective actions through the management of uncertainties (Chung & Gibbons, 1997). Sharma and Chrisman define CE as “… the process whereby an individual or a group of individuals, in association with an existing organization, create a new organization, or instigate renewal or innovation within that organization” (1999: 18). Given its importance to corporate vitality and wealth generation in today’s global economy, CE has generated considerable attention in research. This paper identifies emerging issues in CE and suggests research questions for future research. Our analysis highlights the role of CE in inducing and cultivating organizational learning, which is a key source of new knowledge that could be used to develop organizational capabilities. Learning is at the heart of the strategic renewal process that enables the firm to adapt and respond to challenges in their new markets (Zahra, Nielsen & Bogner, 1999). Given the various types of CE (Covin & Miles, 1999), our discussion applies learning theory to show how CE in domestic and international operations creates new knowledge. This discussion also gives attention to the role of leadership in stimulating organizational learning within CE and harvesting new knowledge. Finally, recognizing the vital importance of learning for strategic renewal, we propose that future researchers should incorporate learning among the key outcomes of CE activities. |