مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | آیا یک زنجیره تامین سبز باعث افزایش اعتبار شرکت می شود؟ شواهد تجربی از بخش های تولید اروپایی |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Does a green supply chain improve corporate reputation? Empirical evidence from European manufacturing sectors |
انتشار | مقاله سال 2020 |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | 10 صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | Scopus – Master Journals List – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
6.511 در سال 2019 |
شاخص H_index | 114 در سال 2020 |
شاخص SJR | 2.375 در سال 2019 |
شناسه ISSN | 0019-8501 |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q1 در سال 2019 |
مدل مفهومی | ندارد |
پرسشنامه | ندارد |
متغیر | دارد |
رفرنس | دارد |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی صنایع، مدیریت |
گرایش های مرتبط | لجستیک و زنجیره تامین، تولید صنعتی، مدیریت عملکرد، مدیریت اجرایی، مدیریت کسب و کار |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله | مدیریت بازاریابی صنعتی – Industrial Marketing Management |
دانشگاه | Department of Economics and Business Administration, School of Economics and Business Studies, University of Malaga, Campus El Ejido s/n., 29071 Málaga, Spain |
کلمات کلیدی | زنجیره تأمین زیست محیطی، زنجیره تأمین سبز، شهرت شرکت، بازارهای B2B، ذینفعان |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Environmental supply chain، Green supply chain، Corporate reputation، B2B markets، Stakeholders |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.12.011 |
کد محصول | E14290 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Abstract
1- Introduction 2- Theory and hypotheses 3- Methodology 4- Results 5- Discussion and conclusion References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract Managing supplier relationships in an environmentally responsible way may prevent risk of adverse publicity and reputational damage to the buying firm. Drawing on the stakeholder approach and the environmental management capability framework, the purpose of this paper is to gain further knowledge regarding the impact of strategies oriented to green supply chain management on a firm’s corporate reputation. We test a set of hypotheses in a panel data of European manufacturing companies for a period of ten years. Our findings provide strong support for the premise that supplier selection, monitoring and partnership termination based on environmental criteria positively influence corporate reputation. Additionally, evidence suggests that the implementation of those strategies in an integral way as well as progressing towards the adoption of green supply chain management benefit a firm’s reputation. This study has implications for theory and practice. Introduction A strong reputation is a decisive resource to reach and maintain competitive advantage (Bergh, Ketchen, Boyd, & Bergh, 2010; Walker, 2010). This strategic potential is due to its own value-creation capability, and to its intangible nature which are qualities that make it difficult for the competitors to imitate (Martín de Castro, Navas López, & López Sáez, 2006). A firm’s reputation is boosted through positive actions, and a suitable management of its resources and capabilities, rather than by increasing advertising or effective corporate communication (Burke, 2011; Hoejmose, Roehrich, & Grosvold, 2014). Environmental sustainability is one of the greatest current challenges that a firm must face to guarantee its legitimacy and good reputation. Governmental legislation and growing environmental concerns among society imply that companies cannot undervalue environmental issues if they want to maintain their competitive advantage. The environmental management comprises responsible use of energy, water, materials, and hazardous substances; emissions reduction, and waste management of water and materials (Porteous, Rammohan, & Lee, 2015). Reputation is not only built around the focal firm’s activities, but is also influenced by the actions developed in B2B partnerships (Money, Hillenbrand, Day, & Magnan, 2010). |