مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد بررسی اولویت مردم برای خیابان های گیاهی – الزویر ۲۰۱۹

elsevier

 

مشخصات مقاله
ترجمه عنوان مقاله بهبود وضعیت طبیعت در شهرها: اولویت مردم برای خیابان های گیاهی چیست؟
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله Improving nature experience in cities: What are people’s preferences for vegetated streets?
انتشار مقاله سال ۲۰۱۹
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی ۱۰ صفحه
هزینه دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد.
پایگاه داده نشریه الزویر
نوع نگارش مقاله
مقاله پژوهشی (Research Article)
مقاله بیس این مقاله بیس میباشد
نمایه (index) MedLine – Scopus – Master Journal List – JCR
نوع مقاله ISI
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی  PDF
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF)
۴٫۲۱۹ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شاخص H_index ۱۳۱ در سال ۲۰۱۹
شاخص SJR ۱٫۱۶۱ در سال ۲۰۱۷
شناسه ISSN ۰۳۰۱-۴۷۹۷
شاخص Quartile (چارک) Q1 در سال ۲۰۱۷
رشته های مرتبط مهندسی معماری، مهندسی شهرسازی
گرایش های مرتبط معماری منظر، طراحی شهری
نوع ارائه مقاله
ژورنال
مجله مجله مدیریت زیست محیطی – Journal of Environmental Management
دانشگاه Ecole de la Nature et du Paysage (INSA Centre Val de Loire Blois) – UMR CNRS 7324 CITERES – France
کلمات کلیدی شهری، پوشش گیاهی، ادراک، ترجیح، خیابان
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی Urban، Spontaneous vegetation، Perception، Preference، Street
شناسه دیجیتال – doi
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.056
کد محصول  E10748
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله  ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید.
دانلود رایگان مقاله دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله سفارش ترجمه این مقاله

 

فهرست مطالب مقاله:
Abstract

۱- Introduction

۲- Material and methods

۳- Results

۴- Discussion

۵- Conclusion

References

بخشی از متن مقاله:

Abstract

In the current context of strong urban sprawl, it becomes urgent to find urban approaches that simultaneously promote ecological functions and relationships between people and nature in cities. Streets are omnipresent urban elements that can deliver ecosystem services and facilitate people daily interactions with nature. Promoting vegetation in streets can take different forms which have to be combined with people’s preferences. Based on photomontages, we assessed people’s perceptions and valuations for herbaceous vegetation types associated to various managements and designs of pavements. Using a combination of a local field survey and a French national online survey, we collected a total of 3609 responses representing a large diversity of socio-demographic characteristics. The results of the field survey confirmed those of the online survey. Although there was variability among people valuations, we found that lowly managed pavements with spontaneous vegetation were in average higher valued than highly managed pavements without vegetation. Pavements with spontaneous vegetation were perceived as less kept than pavements without vegetation, but more beautiful and less boring. We found a consensus of high valuations towards pavements containing vegetation integrated in small design interventions (flowers seeded in foot of wall, design of a meadow strip along the pavement), suggesting that people generally accept vegetation with visible signs of human actions or managements. Socio-demographic characteristics partly explained variabilities in photo valuations. As expected, people frequently connected with nature had the highest preferences for vegetated pavements, spontaneous or integrated in designs. These results show that vegetated streets can become daily biodiversity-friendly urban greenspaces appreciated by urban dwellers. We provide recommendations for promoting vegetation in streets that will be useful for politics, urban designers and managers.

Introduction

The current strong urban sprawl causes profound changes in ecological habitats and associated biodiversity (Grimm et al., 2008). However, it is now recognized that nature experience is required for improving urban dweller health and well-being (Botzat et al., 2016; Cox et al., 2017b) and that it can change people attitudes towards pro-environmental behaviors (Soga and Gaston, 2016). In this context, it is necessary that researchers, designers and managers propose urban approaches that simultaneously promote ecological functions and relationships between people and nature (Aronson et al., 2017; Gaston et al., 2013; Soga and Gaston, 2016). Nature in cities can be promoted at various scales in multiple public or private spaces (Aronson et al., 2017; Beninde et al., 2015). Land sparing and land sharing have been proposed as two spatial approaches located at both opposite ends of a continuum of nature conservation strategies (Lin and Fuller, 2013). Land sparing which consists in introducing large green spaces (e.g. parks) within a compact urban matrix has been shown an adapted strategy for hosting some large animals and uncommon plant species (Caryl et al., 2016; Kendal et al., 2017; Villaseñor et al., 2017) and to develop various people uses including walking, resting or jogging (Palliwoda et al., 2017). However, this approach induces a travel distance between housing and parks which can be a barrier to frequent people use (Soga et al., 2015).

ارسال دیدگاه

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *