مقاله انگلیسی رایگان در مورد استنتاج مدلهای رفتاری نرمافزار در MapReduce – الزویر ۲۰۱۷
مشخصات مقاله | |
ترجمه عنوان مقاله | استنتاج مدلهای رفتاری نرمافزار در MapReduce |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله | Inferring software behavioral models with MapReduce |
انتشار | مقاله سال ۲۰۱۷ |
تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی | ۲۴ صفحه |
هزینه | دانلود مقاله انگلیسی رایگان میباشد. |
پایگاه داده | نشریه الزویر |
نوع نگارش مقاله |
مقاله پژوهشی (Research article) |
مقاله بیس | این مقاله بیس میباشد |
نمایه (index) | scopus – master journals – JCR |
نوع مقاله | ISI |
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی | |
ایمپکت فاکتور(IF) |
۱٫۲۰۵ در سال ۲۰۱۷ |
شاخص H_index | ۵۸ در سال ۲۰۱۹ |
شاخص SJR | ۰٫۳۰۰ در سال ۲۰۱۹ |
شناسه ISSN | ۰۱۶۷-۶۴۲۳ |
شاخص Quartile (چارک) | Q3 در سال ۲۰۱۷ |
رشته های مرتبط | مهندسی کامپیوتر |
گرایش های مرتبط | مهندسی نرم افزار |
نوع ارائه مقاله |
ژورنال |
مجله / کنفرانس | Science of Computer Programming |
دانشگاه | Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList), Key Laboratory for Information System Security, Ministry of Education, School of Software, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China |
کلمات کلیدی | استنتاج مدل، ردیابی پارامتری، تجزیه و تحلیل لاگ، MapReduce. |
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی | Model inference, Parametric trace, Log analysis, MapReduce |
شناسه دیجیتال – doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2017.04.004 |
کد محصول | E11858 |
وضعیت ترجمه مقاله | ترجمه آماده این مقاله موجود نمیباشد. میتوانید از طریق دکمه پایین سفارش دهید. |
دانلود رایگان مقاله | دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی |
سفارش ترجمه این مقاله | سفارش ترجمه این مقاله |
فهرست مطالب مقاله: |
Outline Highlights Abstract Keywords ۱٫ Introduction ۲٫ Overview ۳٫ Formal definitions ۴٫ Sequential trace slicing ۵٫ Distributed trace slicing with MapReduce ۶٫ Distributed model synthesis with MapReduce ۷٫ Experimental evaluation ۸٫ Discussion ۹٫ Related works ۱۰٫ Conclusion Acknowledgements Appendix A. Correctness of distributed trace slicing Appendix B. Correctness of distributed model synthesis References |
بخشی از متن مقاله: |
Abstract In the real world practice, software systems are often built without developing any explicit upfront model. This can cause serious problems that may hinder the almost inevitable future evolution, since at best the only documentation about the software is in the form of source code comments. To address this problem, research has been focusing on automatic inference of models by applying machine learning algorithms to execution logs. However, the logs generated by a real software system may be very large and the inference algorithm can exceed the processing capacity of a single computer. Introduction Software behavior models play an important role in the whole life cycle of software systems. Through models, software engineers may gain a deep understanding of how a system behaves without dealing with the intricacies of the implementation. Although good software engineering practices suggest that models should be developed upfront, before deriving an implementation, reality shows that often models do not exist, or they are inconsistent with the implementation. In fact, building a proper model is costly, hard, and requires both mathematical skills and ingenuity. Moreover, even if models are developed, they are often not updated with the changes in the implementation and therefore the models and the implementation progressively diverge. Model inference is a promising approach to tackle this problem by using machine learning to infer software behavior models automatically from execution logs [1–۳]. Many model inference algorithms [4–۶] have been proposed by recent research. To infer accurate models, the logs should contain as much detail information as possible. However, a log with more information also increases the difficulty of model inference task. The logs generated by real systems are usually very large. For example, Prospex [7] infers state machines from network logs for vulnerability analysis of network applications. In practice, network logs collected passively can be enormous, while models need to be inferred quickly to ensure timeliness of subsequent analyses. |